.png)
GDPR Ready
View report
SOC2 Ready
View report
[email protected]
Discord
LinkedIn
Facebook
Instagram
Youtube
.svg){kind=icon}
Reddit
N8N is a workflow automation platform offering both self-hosted and cloud-based pricing options. While the open-source model is free, operational costs for hosting typically exceed $200/month. Cloud plans start at $20/month but include execution limits, which can make budgeting unpredictable as usage scales. For businesses without dedicated DevOps resources, managing infrastructure and security can add significant expenses, raising the total cost of ownership.
Zapier charges per task, starting at $19.99/month. This structure suits simple workflows but can become costly for complex or high-volume automation due to rapid task consumption. Its user-friendly interface is ideal for smaller teams but may not scale well for larger operations.
Make uses an operations-based pricing model starting at $9/month. This approach balances cost and functionality, but scaling often requires moving to higher tiers. While it supports advanced workflows, unexpected costs can arise with fluctuating data volumes.
Latenode simplifies automation with credit-based pricing tied to execution time. Starting at $19/month, it includes advanced features like AI integrations and headless browser automation without hidden fees. Managed infrastructure eliminates the hassle of hosting, making it a strong choice for teams seeking predictable costs and advanced automation capabilities.
Each platform has its strengths, but the right choice depends on your technical expertise, workflow complexity, and budget priorities. Latenode stands out for its transparent pricing and robust features, offering a streamlined solution for businesses aiming to avoid infrastructure management challenges.
N8N takes a distinctive approach to pricing, offering both flexibility and potential challenges depending on how it’s implemented. Let’s dive into its pricing structure and the trade-offs businesses should consider.
N8N provides two main options: a free, open-source self-hosting model and cloud-hosted plans. The cloud-hosted plans start at $20/month for 2,500 workflow executions, $50/month for 10,000 executions (Pro tier), and custom pricing for enterprise needs.
Unlike traditional per-user pricing, N8N bills based on workflow executions. Each time a workflow runs - whether it’s a simple two-step sync or a multi-layered automation with numerous operations - it counts as one execution. This means that even straightforward automations can quickly add up in terms of usage.
For those opting for self-hosting, while the licensing itself is free, running a basic production environment often incurs infrastructure costs exceeding $200/month.
The self-hosted version of N8N offers full workflow functionality, unlimited executions, and access to all integrations. However, it lacks managed services like cloud execution environments, automatic scaling, and infrastructure support. Users are responsible for backups, security updates, and performance tuning, which can be a demanding task.
On the cloud side, the Starter plan includes 2,500 monthly executions and basic support. This limit can be restrictive for businesses with even moderate automation needs. For example, running 10 workflows hourly during standard business hours would nearly exhaust the monthly quota at 2,200 executions.
The Pro plan, priced at $50/month, adds features like environment variables, webhook authentication, and priority support. Yet, growing businesses may find the 10,000 execution limit insufficient as their automation needs scale.
N8N’s execution-based pricing can lead to unpredictable costs, especially as workflows grow more complex. Adding features like error handling or conditional branches can significantly increase execution counts. For businesses that self-host, expenses can escalate further due to infrastructure requirements.
Self-hosting involves more than just server costs. Businesses need to manage databases, apply security patches, maintain high availability, and handle backups. Basic infrastructure costs often exceed $200/month, with additional expenses for SSL certificates, monitoring, and compliance measures potentially adding $100-300 more. Companies handling sensitive data may face even higher costs to meet security standards.
Execution-based pricing also complicates budgeting during peak periods. For instance, e-commerce businesses often experience surges in automation usage during sales events, consuming months’ worth of execution credits in just days. This variability makes cost planning more challenging compared to subscription models with fixed pricing.
For technically skilled teams with DevOps resources, N8N offers strong flexibility. Its open-source model allows unlimited customization and execution capacity without recurring fees, making it a practical choice for high-volume automations.
However, the total cost of ownership can surprise organizations without dedicated infrastructure expertise. Once infrastructure, security, and maintenance are factored in, the "free" option often becomes more expensive than managed solutions. A realistic self-hosting budget - including proper monitoring, backups, and security - typically ranges from $300-800/month, excluding the cost of staff time.
For businesses that prefer predictable costs and minimal infrastructure management, platforms like Latenode stand out. Latenode offers clear pricing with generous execution limits, simplifying budget planning for growing automation needs. Unlike N8N’s execution-based model, managed solutions remove the uncertainty of capacity and infrastructure management, offering a more straightforward approach.
This breakdown of N8N’s pricing and features provides a foundation for comparing other automation platforms.
Zapier is a well-known platform for automating workflows, offering tools to connect apps and streamline processes. Below is an overview of its pricing model, features, and considerations for scalability.
Zapier’s pricing is based on a task-count system, where each action within a workflow is treated as a separate task. The free plan comes with a limited number of monthly tasks and supports only simple, single-step workflows. In contrast, paid plans increase task limits and unlock multi-step workflows. However, unlike models that count an entire workflow as one execution, Zapier’s approach charges for every individual step. For instance, a workflow with three steps will consume three tasks each time it runs, which can quickly deplete task allowances on lower-tier plans.
The free plan restricts users to single-step automations and offers a narrower range of integrations. Advanced features like conditional logic, premium app connections, and custom webhooks require upgrading to a paid plan. While higher-tier plans provide faster update intervals and additional tools, the task-based pricing structure may present challenges for businesses needing near-real-time automation or handling complex workflows.
As workflows become more intricate, costs can escalate unpredictably under Zapier’s pricing model. Tasks consumed by error handling, data validation, or branching logic can quickly add up, particularly for businesses with high automation volumes. Additionally, the significant jumps in task quotas between pricing tiers may push organizations into higher-cost plans, even if their usage slightly exceeds the limits of a lower tier. This can result in paying for unused capacity, adding to the overall expense.
Zapier’s intuitive interface and extensive library of integrations make it accessible, even for non-technical users. Pre-built templates and detailed documentation simplify setup, making it a strong choice for small to medium-sized businesses with straightforward automation needs. However, as usage grows, the cost per task can increase significantly, especially for businesses with fluctuating workloads or complex processes.
For organizations that require high-volume or sophisticated automations, platforms with more predictable pricing - such as Latenode - might offer a better balance of features and cost efficiency. Zapier is best suited for businesses with consistent, uncomplicated workflows, while those seeking scalability and transparency in pricing may need to consider alternatives.
Make offers a pricing model that aligns well with automation needs, focusing on operations rather than tasks or executions. This approach balances complexity with cost predictability, making it a flexible option for various automation scenarios.
Make's pricing revolves around "operations", which are individual actions like reading a file, sending an email, or updating a record. The free plan includes 1,000 operations per month, while paid plans start at $9/month for 10,000 operations and scale to enterprise levels with millions of operations available.
Unlike platforms that count workflow runs, Make measures operations within a single scenario. For instance, a workflow might use five operations in one execution, depending on its complexity. This granular approach allows for predictable costs but requires careful planning for high-volume workflows. This operations-based structure offers a unique perspective on Make's capabilities compared to other pricing models.
Make's visual scenario builder supports advanced features like conditional logic, error handling, and webhooks. It integrates with over 1,000 apps and offers unlimited scenarios on paid plans. However, the free plan limits users to two active scenarios, with execution intervals restricted to every 15 minutes.
Higher-tier plans unlock features such as custom functions, priority execution, and dedicated IP addresses. One of Make's strengths is its ability to handle complex data transformations and branching logic without consuming extra operations for basic conditional statements. This makes it particularly cost-effective for intricate workflows compared to platforms that charge per task. However, the potential for cost variability as workflows grow in complexity should be considered.
While Make's operation-based pricing is straightforward, it can become unpredictable when handling dynamic data sets. For example, a scenario processing 100 records might use 100 operations one day and 500 the next, depending on data volume. This variability can lead to unexpected costs, especially in scenarios like bulk email campaigns or batch data imports.
As usage grows, moving up pricing tiers can result in noticeable cost jumps. For instance, upgrading from 10,000 to 40,000 operations can significantly increase expenses, even if the additional capacity isn’t fully utilized. Organizations with moderate but unpredictable growth may find this pricing structure challenging.
For businesses with consistent workloads, Make offers strong value. Its operation-based pricing often proves more economical than task-based alternatives for multi-step workflows. The platform's visual interface simplifies advanced automation, making it accessible even to those without deep technical expertise.
However, the operation-counting system requires ongoing monitoring to prevent unexpected overages. Businesses with stable, moderately complex workflows will likely find Make's pricing advantageous. On the other hand, those dealing with high variability may prefer platforms like Latenode, which offer transparent, execution-based pricing that avoids such fluctuations.
Latenode steps in as a smart solution for automation, addressing challenges like infrastructure management and unexpected costs that often accompany other platforms. By offering a fully managed environment and a transparent credit-based pricing model, Latenode simplifies the automation process and eliminates the need for users to worry about hosting or fluctuating execution-based charges.
Latenode’s pricing revolves around a credit-based system, where each credit corresponds to actual execution time. This approach ensures that costs are directly tied to usage. The platform offers four pricing tiers:
The system is designed to be fair and straightforward. For example, a workflow that runs for 5 seconds uses the same credits as a more complex process of the same duration. The minimum charge is 1 credit for executions up to 30 seconds, while Enterprise users enjoy a reduced minimum of 0.1 credits for executions under 3 seconds. This structure avoids the high infrastructure costs that often make self-hosted options exceed $200 per month for typical setups.
Latenode comes packed with features that cater to both small businesses and large enterprises. Across its paid plans, users get access to managed infrastructure, robust security, advanced integrations, and comprehensive support. Key capabilities include:
These features often require additional costs or complex configurations on other platforms, but Latenode includes them as standard.
Plan-specific limitations are clear and manageable:
Advanced tools like AI code copilot, access to over 1 million NPM packages, and sophisticated branching logic are included in all paid plans. Scenario time limits range from 3 minutes on the Free plan to unlimited for Enterprise users, making it suitable for both straightforward and long-running automations.
Latenode’s pricing structure is designed to grow with your needs. The credit system scales naturally, allowing users to handle increased workloads without hidden fees. For example, the Start plan can purchase up to 50,000 additional credits, while the Team plan allows up to 150,000 extra credits. This flexibility makes it easier to manage high-usage periods without immediately upgrading your plan.
By bundling infrastructure, security, and maintenance into its pricing, Latenode eliminates the unpredictable costs often associated with self-hosted systems. This makes it a more practical choice for businesses looking to avoid the headaches of managing their own infrastructure.
For companies without dedicated DevOps teams, Latenode provides a cost-effective way to access enterprise-level automation. Its subscription fees cover hosting, security, and support, creating predictable monthly expenses without surprise bills.
Latenode’s robust feature set is particularly appealing to businesses that need advanced capabilities like role-based access, audit logging, and SSO integration - features that often come as expensive add-ons elsewhere. Additionally, its AI-native design integrates seamlessly with tools like OpenAI, Claude, Gemini, and custom models, consolidating automation capabilities that might otherwise require multiple subscriptions and complex setups.
Here’s a quick breakdown of the plans:
| Plan | Monthly Cost | Credits | Active Workflows | Key Benefits |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Free | $0 | 300 | 3 | Ideal for testing and small tasks |
| Start | $19 | 5,000 | 10 | Perfect for small business needs |
| Team | $59 | 25,000 | 40 | Designed for growing teams |
| Enterprise | $299+ | Custom | Custom | Full enterprise features and compliance |
Latenode’s combination of transparent pricing, powerful features, and ease of use makes it a compelling choice for businesses seeking reliable automation without the complexity of managing infrastructure.
Analyzing the pricing structures and features of leading automation platforms reveals distinct advantages and trade-offs, helping you choose the best fit for your needs. Below is a summary of key pricing aspects for each platform:
N8N provides both an open-source self-hosting option and a managed cloud plan priced at $20 per month. While the self-hosted version offers flexibility for technically skilled teams, the additional costs for infrastructure, maintenance, and security can push monthly expenses to $200–$500 for production environments. The cloud plan simplifies hosting but may include execution limits, requiring careful planning as your usage grows.
Zapier stands out for its intuitive interface and extensive app integrations. Its pricing starts at $19.99 per month on a per-task basis. However, costs can escalate significantly for businesses with fluctuating automation demands or higher task volumes.
Make (formerly known as Integromat) uses an operations-based pricing model starting at $9 per month. While this strikes a balance between cost and functionality, access to advanced features often necessitates upgrading to higher-tier plans.
Latenode sets itself apart with a credit-based pricing model tied to actual execution time. Starting at $19 per month for 5,000 credits, it includes advanced features like headless browser automation, a built-in database, and integrated AI tools - all without additional charges. This approach emphasizes cost transparency while offering a robust feature set.
To simplify the comparison, the table below highlights the core differences:
| Platform | Starting Price | Pricing Model | Hidden Costs | Best For |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N8N | $0 (self-hosted) / $20 (cloud) | Execution-based | Infrastructure, maintenance, and security costs | Technical teams with DevOps expertise |
| Zapier | $19.99/month | Per-task | Premium app connectors and advanced features | Users seeking simplicity for basic workflows |
| Make | $9/month | Operations-based | Costs for advanced modules and higher limits | Users with moderate automation needs |
| Latenode | $19/month | Credit-based (execution time) | None – all features included | Businesses needing predictable costs and advanced automation tools |
One of the biggest distinctions lies in infrastructure management. N8N's self-hosted option requires significant technical resources for tasks like server management, updates, backups, and scaling, which can lead to higher operational costs. In contrast, Latenode offers a fully managed solution with credit-based pricing, charging only for actual usage while including advanced features at no extra cost.
When considering the total cost of ownership, it’s crucial to account for more than just subscription fees. Expenses like hardware, security measures, and technical support can quickly add up. Usage-based pricing models, such as Zapier’s per-task fees, can become costly during periods of high activity. Make's operations-based model provides more predictability but may lack access to certain advanced features without additional upgrades.
Ultimately, the right choice depends on your technical expertise, expected automation workload, and desired feature set. Teams with strong technical capabilities may gravitate toward N8N, while those prioritizing ease of use and managed solutions might prefer platforms like Zapier or Make. For businesses aiming to balance advanced capabilities with predictable costs and minimal infrastructure concerns, Latenode offers a compelling option.
Finding the right automation platform means balancing costs with ease of operation while keeping your team's needs and future growth in mind. Below are some tailored suggestions to help you make an informed decision:
For Technical Teams with DevOps Expertise
If your team has the skills and resources to manage infrastructure, self-hosted solutions can provide complete control over your environment. However, it's important to account for hidden costs like server maintenance, security, and scaling. These expenses can quickly add up, impacting the total cost of ownership. Carefully evaluate these factors before committing, and consider whether offloading infrastructure management might be a smarter alternative.
For Teams Prioritizing Simplicity and Predictable Costs
Managed platforms remove the hassle of server maintenance, security updates, and scalability concerns. Latenode, for example, offers credit-based pricing that simplifies budgeting while delivering advanced features like headless browser automation, a built-in database, and AI integrations. These tools not only streamline workflows but also free up your team to focus on core business objectives.
For Enterprise-Level Organizations
Larger organizations often require scalable solutions and dedicated support. While self-hosted setups allow for extensive customization, they come with significant technical demands and unpredictable operational costs. Managed enterprise plans, such as Latenode's Enterprise option starting at $299 per month, provide a scalable infrastructure and reduce overhead complexities, enabling enterprises to focus on strategic initiatives rather than system upkeep.
When comparing platforms, always factor in the full cost - this includes infrastructure, security, and ongoing maintenance. For many businesses, managed solutions offer the best balance, allowing you to concentrate on growth instead of platform management.
Self-hosting N8N can lead to a range of overlooked expenses that may significantly increase your overall costs. For starters, infrastructure expenses - whether you're using cloud hosting services or maintaining on-premises servers - can quickly add up. Many businesses find these costs surpassing $200 per month, especially as their workflows grow in complexity and volume.
Beyond infrastructure, maintenance responsibilities such as performing software updates, managing backups, and monitoring system performance require skilled technical staff. This often translates to higher labor costs, as these tasks demand both time and expertise.
Another major consideration is security. Safeguarding sensitive data, ensuring compliance with regulations, and addressing potential risks often require additional investments in specialized tools and personnel. These ongoing security needs can further strain budgets.
Ultimately, while self-hosting may seem cost-effective at first glance, these hidden expenses can accumulate over time, potentially outweighing the initial savings. Businesses should thoroughly assess these factors to choose the automation approach that best aligns with their operational needs and financial goals.
Latenode uses a credit-based pricing system that provides clear and consistent costs through fixed credit packages available for purchase upfront. This approach removes the unpredictability often associated with execution-based pricing models, where charges fluctuate based on the number of operations or tasks performed.
By using this system, businesses can plan their budgets with precision, aligning costs with anticipated usage. It also helps avoid surprise expenses as automation demands increase. This straightforward pricing structure makes managing expenses easier and is especially helpful for companies looking to scale their automation efforts efficiently.
For companies that lack a dedicated DevOps team, using a managed automation platform like Latenode can be a game-changer. It takes care of intricate tasks such as setting up infrastructure, managing security, and handling ongoing maintenance - responsibilities that can be both time-intensive and require specialized knowledge.
With a managed solution, businesses can concentrate on their primary operations without the stress of dealing with scalability issues or unexpected expenses. Latenode provides clear, predictable pricing and a fully managed infrastructure, offering a seamless experience while cutting down on operational complexity. This makes it an excellent option for teams aiming to streamline their automation efforts without the technical challenges of self-hosting.
Swap Apps
Application 1
Application 2
Step 1: Choose a Trigger
Step 2: Choose an Action
No credit card needed
Without restriction
