.png)
GDPR Ready
View report
SOC2 Ready
View report
[email protected]
Discord
LinkedIn
Facebook
Instagram
Youtube
.svg){kind=icon}
Reddit
N8N is an open-source automation tool that eliminates software licensing fees but introduces a range of infrastructure and operational costs. While it’s free to download, running it in a production environment can cost $300–$500 per month for basic infrastructure, with additional expenses for security, database management, and DevOps support. These costs often exceed expectations, especially as workflows scale and require more resources. Managed platforms like Latenode simplify automation by offering predictable pricing, built-in infrastructure, and reduced maintenance needs, making them a practical choice for most businesses. Let’s explore how these options compare.
Let’s take a closer look at the n8n self-hosted cost to uncover the true expenses involved. While the N8N software itself is free, running it in a production environment typically incurs infrastructure costs ranging from $300 to $500 per month. This estimate doesn’t include additional operational, security, and maintenance expenses, which can further increase the total cost.
At the heart of any N8N deployment is the server infrastructure. A basic production setup often requires cloud resources, such as AWS EC2 or Google Cloud instances, costing around $50–$80 per month. For workflows with moderate complexity, memory requirements may increase due to N8N’s Node.js architecture, necessitating 2–4 GB of RAM. Beyond compute power, storage for databases, backups, and logs can add another $30–$60 per month. Once infrastructure is established, security measures become the next area of focus.
Security is a non-negotiable aspect of self-hosting, and it comes with its own set of costs. Standard security measures, including SSL certificates, firewalls, intrusion detection, and compliance monitoring, can range from $40 to $100 per month. If your organization handles sensitive data, you may need to invest in advanced encryption, audit logging, and specialized security scanning tools, which can significantly raise the cost. After securing your environment, attention shifts to managing databases.
Database hosting and management introduce recurring expenses beyond the cost of the infrastructure itself. Managed services for PostgreSQL or MySQL typically cost between $25 and $80 per month. Adding disaster recovery features, such as automated backups and failover systems, can tack on another $20–$50. Beyond the hardware and software, maintaining database performance also requires skilled oversight.
Running N8N in a production environment involves regular maintenance, updates, and troubleshooting. This operational overhead can demand 10–20 hours of DevOps work each month, translating to costs of $500–$1,000. For larger deployments, enterprise-grade setups often require dedicated infrastructure teams, which can push monthly operational costs to over $2,000.
To ensure workflows run smoothly, monitoring and alerting systems are essential. Whether using tools like Datadog or New Relic or opting for self-hosted solutions, these services can cost between $30 and $150 per month, depending on the level of observability required.
When comparing the n8n hosting cost with managed solutions, the differences become clear. While N8N eliminates licensing fees, the combined expenses for infrastructure, security, and operations often result in higher overall costs. Managed solutions like Latenode offer predictable pricing and reduce the need for extensive DevOps involvement.
Here’s a breakdown of typical costs based on deployment size:
| Deployment Size | N8N Self-Hosted Monthly Cost | Latenode Managed Monthly Cost | Key Differences |
|---|---|---|---|
| Small (1–3 workflows) | $150–300 | $19–59 | Hands-on management needed for servers, security, and backups |
| Medium (10–40 workflows) | $400–800 | $59–299 | Requires dedicated DevOps resources and scaling expertise |
| Enterprise (40+ workflows) | $1,200–3,000+ | From $299 | Demands full infrastructure teams and compliance measures |
Note: These figures reflect direct infrastructure and service costs. Additional labor costs for maintenance and troubleshooting should also be considered when calculating the total cost of ownership.
Scaling a self-hosted N8N deployment can present significant challenges. Traffic spikes might require load balancing, additional server instances, and database scaling, potentially tripling monthly costs during peak periods. Implementing auto-scaling capabilities requires advanced infrastructure management skills, which many teams may lack.
Disaster recovery is another critical factor. Ensuring uptime through geographic redundancy, automated failover systems, and data replication can add $100–$300 per month. While these measures are sometimes overlooked during initial planning, they are essential for maintaining a stable, production-grade environment.
Latenode offers a managed approach to automation, providing comprehensive capabilities at predictable costs. This eliminates the need for provisioning servers, maintaining security measures, or managing backups. By simplifying these complexities, Latenode often delivers a total cost of ownership that is easier to budget and manage, making it a practical choice for many organizations.
N8N operates as an open-source platform, eliminating licensing fees but requiring a substantial investment in infrastructure and ongoing management.
While the absence of licensing costs is appealing, deploying N8N in a production environment involves significant expenses. These include robust cloud infrastructure, security measures, monitoring tools, and continuous operational management. Often, organizations underestimate these additional requirements, leading to higher-than-anticipated costs as they scale their deployment.
N8N is relatively light on CPU usage, requiring just 1 vCPU for basic operations, as it isn't typically CPU-intensive[1]. However, memory and storage planning are critical. Memory needs can range from 320 MB for simple setups to 2 GB for more complex workflows. Idle instances might use around 100 MB, but workflows involving data-heavy operations, such as duplication, can push memory usage higher[1].
Storage requirements depend on the database choice and workload. For instance, database storage typically ranges from 512 MB to 4 GB of SSD space. PostgreSQL is recommended for production environments due to its superior performance and reliability compared to SQLite[1]. In containerized setups, persistent storage is essential to prevent data loss.
A production-grade deployment also requires additional components to ensure security and stability. These include setting up an Nginx reverse proxy with proper security headers, configuring SSL certificates with automated renewal (e.g., via Let's Encrypt), and implementing health monitoring with automatic restarts[2]. Each of these elements adds to the overall infrastructure complexity.
Securing a self-hosted N8N deployment is a multifaceted challenge. Basic security measures, such as IP allow lists and regular automated database backups, are essential for maintaining stability[1]. For organizations handling sensitive data, compliance requirements add another layer of complexity, demanding more robust security protocols.
Free SSL services like Let's Encrypt can simplify encryption, but they require automated renewal and consistent monitoring to remain effective. Additionally, organizations must implement firewalls, intrusion detection systems, and security scanning tools to safeguard their deployment. Ensuring that database volumes in containerized environments are correctly persisted and mounted is also critical to avoid data loss[1].
Managing a self-hosted N8N setup requires ongoing DevOps support for tasks such as updates, patches, and performance tuning. As workflows grow in complexity and traffic increases, scaling the infrastructure may require additional servers, load balancing, and database optimization - all of which contribute to rising operational costs.
Disaster recovery planning further complicates self-hosting. Measures like geographic redundancy, automated failover systems, and data replication are essential for ensuring reliability but demand significant effort and expertise. Unlike managed solutions such as Latenode, which include operational support as part of the service, self-hosted deployments place the full responsibility on the organization to develop and maintain these critical capabilities.
Latenode simplifies automation by eliminating the complexities of infrastructure management and hidden expenses. It provides a fully managed platform with clear, usage-based pricing, making it accessible and predictable for businesses of all sizes.
Latenode's pricing model is built around workflow executions, offering flexibility and control. Starting with a free tier that includes 300 credits per month, businesses can scale up to enterprise plans beginning at $299 per month. This credit-based system ensures you only pay for active processing time, avoiding wasted resources and unexpected costs.
For smaller projects or medium-sized automation needs, the Start plan at $19 per month is a popular choice. It includes 5,000 execution credits, 10 active workflows, and 10 connected accounts - enough for many use cases that might otherwise require costly self-hosted infrastructure.
Each execution credit corresponds to roughly one second of processing time, with a minimum of one credit for workflows completed within 30 seconds. This predictable cost structure contrasts sharply with the fluctuating expenses often associated with self-hosted setups. As you explore further, you’ll see how Latenode’s infrastructure takes the technical load off your shoulders.
Latenode’s managed infrastructure automatically handles all the behind-the-scenes technical needs - computing power, memory, storage, and scaling - so you don’t have to. The platform supports over 300 app integrations and 200+ AI models, creating a unified environment for diverse automation tasks.
A standout feature is the built-in database functionality, which allows you to manage structured data directly within workflows. This eliminates the need for external database hosting and its associated costs. Additionally, integrated headless browser automation removes the need for extra servers, which can significantly drive up expenses in self-hosted setups.
Scaling is seamless, with the platform automatically adjusting to workflow demands. Enterprise plans can support up to 150+ parallel executions, sparing users from the headaches of capacity planning and load balancing - challenges that often make self-hosting with tools like N8N costly as usage increases.
In addition to its cost efficiency, Latenode prioritizes security as a built-in feature rather than an add-on. The platform includes SSL encryption, secure data transmission, and compliance-ready infrastructure, all without requiring specialized expertise or extra tools.
For organizations with strict data control requirements, Latenode offers self-hosting options. This hybrid approach combines the ease of a managed platform with the compliance advantages of on-premises deployment. It’s a practical solution for businesses hesitant about fully managed setups due to data ownership concerns, often a driving factor for choosing complex self-hosted solutions like N8N.
Latenode also provides 60-day log history on enterprise plans, along with automated backups and disaster recovery. These features, which typically demand significant investment in self-hosted environments, are included without additional cost, saving both time and money.
By automating updates, monitoring, and scaling, Latenode reduces the need for dedicated DevOps resources, cutting operational overhead. Its visual workflow builder, paired with AI Code Copilot, streamlines development, saving time and eliminating the need for separate technical environments.
The platform’s built-in debugging tools and support for complex integrations further reduce reliance on external monitoring solutions. Features like execution history and scenario re-runs allow users to fine-tune workflows without investing in additional logging or monitoring infrastructure, delivering a streamlined and efficient automation experience.
Let’s break down the practical differences between N8N's self-hosted setup and Latenode's managed platform, focusing on costs and operational impact.
| Criteria | N8N Self-Hosted | Latenode Managed Platform |
|---|---|---|
| Initial Cost | ✅ Free open-source license (but hidden costs add up quickly) | ✅ Freemium plan to start, with production pricing starting at $19/month |
| Infrastructure Management | ❌ Requires dedicated DevOps expertise | ✅ Fully managed with automatic scaling |
| Total Monthly Cost | ❌ Typically $200–$800+ when factoring infrastructure, security, and maintenance | ✅ Predictable pricing, ranging from $19 to $299+ based on usage |
| Security & Compliance | ❌ Manual setup, patching, and monitoring required | ✅ Built-in SSL, encryption, and compliance features |
| Customization Control | ✅ Full code access for modifications | ✅ Extensive customization via visual builder and coding options |
| Scaling Complexity | ❌ Manual capacity planning and load balancing | ✅ Automatic scaling (supports 150+ parallel executions on higher-tier plans) |
| Maintenance Overhead | ❌ Requires regular updates, patches, and infrastructure upkeep | ✅ Zero maintenance - platform handles updates and monitoring |
| Time to Production | ❌ Setup and configuration can take weeks | ✅ Deploy workflows in minutes |
| Disaster Recovery | ❌ Requires custom-built backup and recovery systems | ✅ Integrated backups and configurable log retention (up to 60 days on advanced plans) |
| Technical Expertise Required | ❌ High - requires skills in Linux, Docker, and database management | ✅ Low - intuitive interface with optional coding for advanced needs |
At first glance, N8N's free license might seem appealing, but the real costs of infrastructure, maintenance, and security can quickly escalate. Hosting it yourself demands ongoing attention, from applying updates to managing backups and ensuring reliability. This level of DevOps involvement not only consumes significant time but also introduces risks of downtime or misconfigurations.
In contrast, Latenode eliminates these operational burdens by automating core tasks like updates, scaling, and security. Its managed infrastructure comes with built-in redundancy and professional support, ensuring smooth operation without requiring constant oversight from your team.
One of N8N’s strengths is its complete codebase access, allowing users to modify and customize workflows as needed. However, this level of freedom comes with a steep learning curve and added complexity, which can be overwhelming for teams without dedicated technical expertise. Latenode, on the other hand, provides a balance by offering advanced customization options through an intuitive visual builder, supplemented by coding for those who need deeper control - without the hassle of managing the underlying infrastructure.
Over time, managed platforms like Latenode often prove more cost-effective for growing businesses. While N8N’s costs scale with increasing infrastructure demands, Latenode offers predictable pricing tiers, making it easier to budget for future needs. For organizations aiming to scale efficiently, this transparency in pricing and resource allocation can be a game-changer.
When choosing between self-hosted and managed platforms, it’s essential to look beyond initial costs and evaluate the total cost of ownership. Latenode’s managed approach minimizes operational complexity, reduces risks, and provides a clear path for scaling, making it a strong choice for teams looking to streamline their automation processes.
After analyzing the costs and operational factors, it's clear that the choice between self-hosting and managed automation depends on your technical resources, need for predictable costs, and long-term automation objectives. While self-hosting may work for specific scenarios, it often comes with hidden challenges that are easy to overlook.
N8N self-hosting is suitable for select cases. Organizations with well-established DevOps teams, ample infrastructure budgets, and strict compliance requirements that necessitate full control over their code might benefit from this approach. However, these situations are rare, and many underestimate the ongoing effort required to manage infrastructure, security, and updates.
For most organizations, Latenode's managed platform offers a more reliable and cost-effective solution. When you account for all expenses - from infrastructure and security to maintenance and disaster recovery - the advantages of a managed service become evident. Latenode provides transparent pricing across multiple tiers, eliminating hidden costs while ensuring consistent performance and scalability, supporting up to 150+ parallel executions.
Self-hosting with N8N requires expertise in areas like system administration, container management, database handling, and compliance. In contrast, Latenode's managed platform allows teams to focus entirely on designing workflows without worrying about backend complexities.
Recommendation: Unless your organization has specific technical needs and dedicated resources for self-hosting, starting with Latenode's managed platform is the smarter choice. Its features, including a visual workflow builder, built-in database, headless browser automation, and integration with over 300 apps, deliver significant value without the headaches of infrastructure management. For teams requiring advanced customizations, Latenode also supports full JavaScript integration and access to NPM packages, offering flexibility without sacrificing ease of use.
Latenode’s straightforward pricing tiers simplify financial planning and minimize unexpected costs. This transparency, combined with the removal of routine maintenance burdens, makes it an ideal option for teams focusing on achieving automation goals rather than managing infrastructure.
Self-hosting N8N might initially appear to be an affordable choice, but there are often overlooked costs that can accumulate quickly. For starters, infrastructure expenses - including servers, databases, and storage - can range anywhere from $50 to over $500 per month, depending on your operational scale and the level of reliability you require.
On top of that, security investments such as SSL certificates, firewalls, and compliance checks can further drive up the total cost. These are essential to protect your data and ensure regulatory standards are met, but they don't come cheap.
Another factor to consider is the need for ongoing maintenance and updates, which typically demand skilled DevOps support. This not only involves time but also adds labor costs that many teams fail to account for upfront. As your usage increases, these expenses can escalate, potentially making self-hosting a pricier option than initially anticipated. It’s crucial to weigh these elements carefully to avoid unplanned financial strain down the road.
Managing a self-hosted N8N setup can be quite demanding. It involves tasks like configuring and maintaining servers, setting up strong security measures such as SSL certificates and firewalls, and ensuring adherence to data protection regulations. These responsibilities require specialized technical skills and constant attention, which often translates to higher costs and significant time investment.
On the other hand, using a managed platform like Latenode takes care of all the heavy lifting for you. The infrastructure, security protocols, and ongoing maintenance are fully managed, removing the need for dedicated DevOps resources. This simplifies operations, reduces complexity, and allows your team to concentrate on building and refining automations instead of worrying about backend management. For many organizations, this approach proves to be both more efficient and cost-effective.
When choosing between self-hosting and a managed platform for automation, it's essential to consider your organization's technical skills, budget, and long-term objectives.
Self-hosting provides full control and the ability to tailor solutions to your specific needs. However, it comes with responsibilities like maintaining servers, applying security updates, and scaling infrastructure as demands grow. These tasks can be time-consuming and often require a dedicated DevOps team to manage effectively.
In contrast, managed platforms take care of infrastructure, security, and scaling for you. This allows your team to focus on building and running automations rather than handling backend maintenance. While managed platforms might involve higher initial costs, they often lower overall operational expenses and offer dependable performance. This can be particularly beneficial for organizations with limited technical resources or stringent compliance requirements.
The decision ultimately hinges on your team’s expertise, the degree of control you require, and whether the ease and reliability of a managed platform align with your needs and budget.
Swap Apps
Application 1
Application 2
Step 1: Choose a Trigger
Step 2: Choose an Action
No credit card needed
Without restriction
