.png)
GDPR Ready
View report
SOC2 Ready
View report
[email protected]
Discord
LinkedIn
Facebook
Instagram
Youtube
.svg){kind=icon}
Reddit
N8N is an open-source, self-hosted automation platform tailored for developers who need full control and advanced customization. It eliminates per-execution costs, making it ideal for high-volume workflows but requires technical expertise for setup and maintenance. In contrast, Make.com offers a cloud-based, user-friendly interface with over 1,200 pre-built integrations and predictable pricing starting at $9/month for 10,000 operations. While Make.com simplifies automation for non-technical users, N8N provides flexibility for complex, custom workflows. For those seeking a balance of simplicity and technical depth, Latenode emerges as a strong alternative, combining easy-to-use visual tools with robust customization like JavaScript support and managed infrastructure. This article explores how these platforms compare across hosting, interface, integrations, pricing, and scalability to help you choose the right tool for your needs.
The way n8n and Make.com handle hosting significantly influences data security and overall costs. Let’s break down the details of each platform's setup and hosting approach.
N8N's Self-Hosted Model
N8N is an open-source platform that you install and run on your own infrastructure. This setup gives you complete control over the system but comes with the responsibility of managing databases, SSL certificates, updates, and security. You can deploy n8n on popular cloud services like AWS, Google Cloud, or DigitalOcean.
However, this control isn’t without its challenges. You’re responsible for keeping the system operational, applying security patches, managing data backups, and scaling resources as automation demands grow. Hosting n8n on a cloud provider typically involves costs for the server, database storage, and bandwidth usage.
Make.com's Fully Managed SaaS
Make.com, on the other hand, is a cloud-based platform that takes care of all infrastructure, security, and maintenance. All you need to do is create an account, log in, and start building workflows within minutes. This simplicity allows users to focus solely on designing workflows without worrying about technical upkeep.
The downside is limited control. You can’t modify the platform’s core functions, and you’re dependent on Make.com’s infrastructure for performance and availability. This trade-off might not suit users who need extensive customization or control over their environment.
Data Control and Compliance
When handling sensitive or regulated data, hosting becomes a critical factor. N8N’s self-hosted setup ensures all data remains within your infrastructure, which can be essential for industries with strict compliance requirements, such as healthcare (HIPAA) or financial services (PCI DSS).
Make.com, while SOC 2 Type II certified, processes data through its cloud infrastructure. This may raise concerns for organizations that need absolute control over their data storage and processing.
Ease of Setup
Make.com offers a straightforward setup process, allowing you to create workflows without any technical expertise. In contrast, n8n requires a more complex setup involving Docker, database management, and web server configuration, which can significantly extend the time needed to get started.
Scalability and Maintenance
As your automation needs grow, scalability and maintenance requirements differ between the two platforms. With n8n, scaling involves planning your infrastructure, optimizing databases, and managing load balancing. This puts the responsibility for growth on your organization.
Make.com, however, scales automatically. As your workflows and execution volumes increase, the platform adjusts resources seamlessly. While you’ll pay for higher usage, you avoid the technical complexities of capacity planning.
Maintenance is another key difference. N8N requires ongoing attention, including security updates, system monitoring, and backup management. Make.com, by contrast, handles all maintenance tasks, freeing you to focus on building workflows and achieving business goals.
Latenode: A Balanced Alternative
Latenode combines the simplicity of a cloud platform with the control and customization of self-hosting. It eliminates the complexities of managing infrastructure while still offering robust options for data control and advanced customization, making it a versatile choice for businesses looking to streamline their automation.
Creating workflows and automations becomes much more approachable with a well-designed interface, and the visual workflow builder plays a key role in making this process accessible to a wide range of users, from beginners to seasoned developers.
Make.com simplifies automation building with its drag-and-drop interface and a library of pre-built templates. These tools make it easy to visualize and connect services, showing clear data flows between each step.
To help users get started, the platform provides helpful tooltips, onboarding tutorials, and clear error messages. When mapping data between apps, dropdown menus display available fields, reducing guesswork and streamlining the process.
For those new to automation, Make.com's templates and intuitive modules are a game-changer. They handle the complexity of API connections behind the scenes, allowing users to create functional automations quickly. By comparison, N8N caters to a more technical audience, offering deeper customization options for those with programming knowledge.
N8N appeals to developers and advanced users by offering extensive technical control. Building workflows often involves working with programming concepts like data types, JSON structures, and conditional logic. Configuring nodes in N8N generally requires an understanding of the underlying data structure.
This platform excels in scenarios requiring custom JavaScript functions, intricate branching logic, or direct API manipulation. Its ability to access raw data objects and execute custom code within workflow nodes provides a level of flexibility that surpasses Make.com's capabilities. This makes N8N ideal for users who need highly tailored solutions, even if it comes with a steeper learning curve.
Make.com is designed to guide users through the automation process with structured tutorials and sample data. These tutorials cover common scenarios, such as linking Google Sheets to Slack or syncing CRM contacts with email tools, and provide step-by-step instructions that deliver quick, tangible results.
On the other hand, N8N assumes a higher level of technical expertise. While it offers documentation and examples, users often need to understand concepts like webhook setup, data parsing, and error handling before they can confidently create reliable workflows. This difference reflects the platforms' distinct user bases - Make.com prioritizes simplicity, while N8N caters to those comfortable with technical details.
For users tackling complex automations, N8N stands out with its advanced features. It supports custom JavaScript functions, branching logic, and even the creation of custom nodes. These capabilities make it possible to build intricate workflows with detailed decision-making processes and sophisticated data manipulation.
Make.com, while less customizable, provides built-in functions and filters to handle advanced logic. This approach is sufficient for most business automation needs and does not require programming knowledge, making it a practical choice for users who prefer simplicity over technical depth.
Collaboration is another area where these platforms differ. Make.com is designed for teamwork, offering features like shared templates, user roles, and detailed workflow documentation. These tools make it easy for multiple users to collaborate on automations simultaneously.
N8N's collaboration features depend heavily on the hosting setup. The cloud version includes basic team functionality, but the self-hosted option requires additional configuration to enable multi-user access and manage permissions effectively.
Latenode offers a unique solution that combines the best of both worlds, merging user-friendly design with powerful customization options. Its visual workflow builder is reminiscent of Make.com's simplicity, but it also incorporates advanced features valued by N8N users.
One standout feature is the AI Code Copilot, which generates JavaScript code directly within visual workflows. This bridges the gap between technical and non-technical users, enabling access to advanced functionality without the need to learn programming. By integrating ease-of-use with technical flexibility, Latenode creates a balanced platform for users of all skill levels.
When it comes to automation platforms, app connections play a major role in determining their usefulness for various business needs. The range and quality of these integrations directly impact how well a platform can meet specific requirements, making it a key factor when choosing the right solution.
Make.com stands out with an impressive catalog of integrations, boasting over 1,200 built-in options, with some sources suggesting the number exceeds 2,000[2][3]. This library includes popular tools like Shopify, Salesforce, Google Drive, HubSpot, and Slack, covering a wide spectrum of business applications.
One of Make.com's strengths lies in its consistently updated integration modules. These are maintained by the platform's own team, ensuring reliable performance even as APIs change over time. The platform focuses on delivering commonly used triggers and actions for each app, making it a practical choice for handling everyday business tasks. However, it may not be the best fit for users needing advanced customization.
N8N takes a different route, offering over 400 built-in integrations[1][2]. While this number is smaller compared to Make.com, N8N compensates with unmatched technical flexibility. It is particularly appealing for scenarios that require custom JavaScript functions, intricate branching logic, or direct API manipulation[1][5]. Users can work with raw data objects and write custom code within workflow nodes, making it a go-to option for tailored and complex solutions.
The platform’s open-source nature adds another layer of flexibility. Community-contributed nodes can expand the integration library beyond the official offerings. However, this approach comes with varying levels of quality, as not all community-created nodes are rigorously tested or maintained.
Both platforms offer robust support for custom API connections, but their approaches differ. N8N allows users to create custom nodes and manage APIs with full control, while Make.com provides a more guided configuration process[1][5]. For instance, Make.com's HTTP module simplifies API calls with dropdowns and form fields, making it easier for non-technical users.
Authentication is another area where the platforms diverge. N8N gives users direct control over credentials, supporting OAuth2, API keys, and custom authentication flows. This is particularly useful for organizations that self-host the platform and need full security control[2][5]. On the other hand, Make.com manages authentication through its cloud platform, ensuring secure storage and handling of credentials[2].
The reliability of integrations can vary significantly between the two platforms. Make.com's team-maintained modules are known for their robust error handling, detailed field mapping, and well-documented processes. This reliability is especially beneficial when connecting to complex enterprise systems like SAP or Oracle.
In contrast, N8N’s integration quality depends on the source. Official nodes are generally reliable, but community-contributed options may lack the same level of testing or ongoing updates. Advanced users, however, can modify or create custom nodes to address any limitations, offering a level of adaptability that Make.com doesn’t match.
Each platform shines in different real-world applications. N8N is preferred by technical teams for automating complex workflows. For example, it’s used to sync data between internal tools and external SaaS platforms or to manage multi-step workflows with conditional logic and custom code[1][5]. A common use case includes building CI/CD pipelines that integrate tools like GitHub, Jira, Slack, and custom deployment systems.
Make.com, on the other hand, is popular with marketing and operations teams for its ease of use. It’s ideal for automating tasks like transferring leads from web forms to CRMs, syncing e-commerce orders to spreadsheets, or sending notifications across various channels[3][5]. Marketing teams particularly value its ability to quickly connect tools like Facebook Ads, Google Analytics, and email marketing platforms without needing technical expertise.
| Feature | N8N | Make.com |
|---|---|---|
| Built-in Integrations | 400+ (expandable via custom nodes) | 1,200+ pre-built modules |
| Custom API Support | Extensive (custom nodes, HTTP requests) | Supported (HTTP module, simpler setup) |
| Webhook Support | Advanced, fully customizable | Easy setup, guided configuration |
| Integration Quality | Variable (depends on source) | Consistently high for popular apps |
| Authentication Control | Full control (especially self-hosted) | Managed through cloud platform |
Latenode offers a middle ground between Make.com's extensive pre-built library and N8N's technical flexibility. With over 300 app integrations, it combines ease of use with the ability to handle advanced customization. Latenode’s visual interface simplifies connecting popular tools, while its robust API capabilities cater to users who need more control over their workflows. This balance makes Latenode a practical option for businesses seeking both simplicity and depth, without the need for self-hosting expertise.
Understanding the true cost of workflow automation involves more than just evaluating subscription fees. Beyond initial pricing, factors like operational limits, infrastructure needs, and scalability play a significant role in shaping the total cost of ownership. In this section, we compare the pricing structures of Make.com and N8N to highlight how these elements impact businesses of different sizes and technical requirements.
Make.com employs a straightforward, cloud-based pricing model with clearly defined limits on workflow operations. Their free plan caters to basic testing and small-scale automations, making it a good starting point for individuals or smaller teams. For more advanced needs, Make.com offers several paid tiers that include higher operation limits and additional features such as webhooks, custom functions, and team collaboration tools.
Each action within a workflow counts as an operation, meaning that complex automations can quickly approach these limits. This pricing structure appeals to small and medium-sized businesses that value cost predictability, as the monthly fees are transparent and include minimal hidden charges.
N8N provides an open-source option, which may seem like a low-cost solution at first glance. However, self-hosting N8N comes with a range of additional expenses. Businesses managing their own deployment must account for server costs, storage, backups, SSL certificates, and ongoing maintenance. Ensuring scalability and reliability often requires dedicated technical expertise, adding further to the total cost.
To simplify this process, N8N also offers a cloud-hosted version. This option includes infrastructure management within its subscription, providing a pricing structure more comparable to Make.com's cloud-native approach. The hosted version features tiered execution limits and additional capabilities, reducing the complexity of self-hosted deployments.
When scaling automation, cost transparency becomes critical. Make.com's predictable, all-inclusive pricing model offers clarity, especially for businesses with high operational demands. In contrast, N8N's self-hosted option introduces variable expenses that can increase the total cost of ownership, particularly for companies lacking in-house technical expertise.
For enterprises handling large volumes of operations, the simplicity and predictability of managed, usage-based pricing can be a major advantage. On the other hand, while N8N’s open-source flexibility is appealing, the indirect costs of self-hosting - such as infrastructure and maintenance - can outweigh the initial savings.
Make.com's clearly defined usage limits allow businesses to plan their scaling needs effectively, minimizing risks of unexpected overages. For example, companies managing multiple integrations like order processing, inventory updates, or customer notifications can benefit from this predictability. In contrast, businesses opting for a self-hosted N8N setup must invest in additional resources, such as infrastructure and technical support, to ensure stable performance during high-demand periods.
Here’s a comparison of the pricing models:
| Factor | Make.com | N8N Self-Hosted | N8N Cloud |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base Monthly Cost | Predictable, all-inclusive fee | Lower software cost; hosting fees apply | Defined by subscription tier |
| Infrastructure | Included in the subscription | Requires separate hosting and services | Included |
| Maintenance | Fully managed by Make.com | Requires ongoing technical upkeep | Fully managed |
| Scaling Complexity | Low – scales with usage | High – variable costs and complexity | Moderate |
| Predictable Costs | Yes | Less predictable | Yes |
For enterprise-level deployments, balancing predictable pricing with scalability is essential. Make.com offers plans tailored to large-scale operations, including dedicated support, service level agreements, and managed infrastructure. These features simplify budgeting and scaling efforts. On the other hand, while N8N’s open-source nature provides flexibility, building a robust, enterprise-ready solution with self-hosting often demands significant upfront investments in infrastructure and specialized expertise.
Latenode stands out by combining flexibility with simplicity. Its transparent pricing eliminates the need to manage infrastructure, while still offering powerful automation capabilities. This approach provides a scalable and predictable solution, making it an excellent choice for businesses looking to grow without the added complexity of self-hosted systems.
Custom code extensions play a crucial role in enhancing workflow automation. Both Make.com and N8N offer support for code integration, but their approaches reflect their distinct design philosophies. This contrast highlights how each platform caters to varying business requirements when it comes to coding capabilities.
Make.com includes a built-in JavaScript editor that allows users to create custom functions for tasks like data manipulation and workflow logic. Its sandboxed environment ensures stability and simplicity but limits access to external libraries. While this setup is well-suited for common data transformations, it may fall short for businesses needing more advanced integrations or AI-driven functionality.
N8N takes a more developer-oriented approach. Its self-hosted architecture supports custom nodes, enabling the use of external libraries for advanced logic. This flexibility is ideal for businesses that require tailored solutions or need to perform complex data processing operations.
The platforms also differ in their handling of conditional logic and data processing. Make.com relies on visual tools like routers and filters to manage workflow decisions, making it user-friendly for simpler automation needs. N8N, however, allows users to embed inline code expressions, offering finer control over workflows. It also supports intricate API setups and custom database operations, making it a better fit for specialized use cases.
Make.com's cloud-based infrastructure automates performance optimization, appealing to users who prefer a managed service. In contrast, N8N's self-hosted model gives users full control over resource allocation and performance tuning. This is particularly advantageous for teams with the technical expertise to handle high-throughput or unique automation scenarios.
Latenode bridges the gap between these two platforms by offering a hybrid approach. It combines an intuitive visual workflow builder with robust native JavaScript support, enabling developers to leverage over 1 million NPM packages. Features such as an AI Code Copilot, built-in database tools, and headless browser automation provide advanced functionality without requiring additional software. This balance of ease-of-use and deep customization makes Latenode an appealing choice for organizations seeking a versatile solution that meets both technical and user-friendly demands.
When automation moves beyond simple workflows, performance becomes a critical factor. The way platforms handle execution speed, reliability, and scalability can significantly impact their efficiency and suitability for growing demands. Let’s explore how Make.com, N8N, and Latenode tackle these challenges.
Make.com leverages a cloud-native infrastructure designed to handle high-volume automation needs. Its managed environment automatically optimizes resource allocation, ensuring consistent execution times for most workflows. This setup is particularly beneficial for enterprises that require dependable performance without manual adjustments.
On the other hand, N8N’s self-hosted model gives users direct control over server resources such as compute power and memory. This means organizations can fine-tune their infrastructure to achieve faster processing speeds for resource-heavy tasks. However, this flexibility comes with added responsibilities - managing server capacity, monitoring performance, and scaling infrastructure must all be handled internally. While this approach can boost speed, it places a heavier operational burden on the user.
Make.com simplifies reliability by automating server maintenance, security updates, and performance optimizations. Its cloud-based architecture ensures consistent uptime, with the platform itself handling infrastructure management. This hands-off approach is ideal for users who prioritize reliability without wanting to manage technical details.
N8N, in contrast, depends heavily on the hosting environment and the expertise of the team managing it. While a well-maintained self-hosted deployment can achieve excellent uptime, it requires dedicated resources for server management, backups, and disaster recovery planning. Reliability here is achievable but demands ongoing effort and technical know-how.
Make.com’s scalability shines with its automatic resource adjustments based on workflow demands. This allows the platform to handle enterprise-level automation seamlessly, without requiring user intervention.
N8N scales differently, relying on hardware upgrades and infrastructure expansion. Organizations can add more processing power, memory, or server instances as their automation needs grow. This approach provides predictable scaling costs but requires technical expertise to implement effectively. While N8N’s method offers precise control over resources, it also demands continuous monitoring and planning to maintain performance under growing loads.
Latenode takes a hybrid approach to performance management, blending the strengths of managed infrastructure with the flexibility of customization. By offering dedicated environments with fixed resource allocation, Latenode ensures consistent performance without requiring users to manage self-hosted setups. Charges are based on actual processing time, providing a transparent and scalable cost structure as automation tasks become more complex. This setup eliminates the infrastructure management challenges of self-hosting while avoiding the shared-resource limitations of purely cloud-based platforms.
When evaluating automation platforms, the support structure and business-oriented features play a critical role in determining their overall effectiveness. While core functionalities are important, the ability to provide reliable assistance during challenges and meet necessary compliance standards is what often sets platforms apart. These aspects can directly influence how smoothly businesses operate and adapt to automation.
Make.com offers structured support tailored to different subscription levels. For standard plans, the support team addresses technical issues via a ticketing system, with response times generally between 24 to 48 hours. Enterprise customers benefit from priority support, faster response times, and dedicated account management. While their support is reliable, resolving complex issues may require multiple back-and-forth interactions.
On the other hand, N8N’s support model reflects its open-source nature. Community users primarily rely on GitHub issues, Discord channels, and forums for help. While the community is active and knowledgeable, response times can vary significantly based on availability. For those using N8N's commercial cloud offering, email support is available, but it remains more limited compared to platforms with dedicated enterprise services. Organizations hosting N8N themselves often need in-house technical expertise to troubleshoot issues. However, the platform compensates with a wealth of learning resources to aid users.
Make.com provides well-organized documentation, including tutorials, video guides, and step-by-step instructions for integrations. These resources cover common use cases and feature visual examples to simplify workflow creation. Additionally, Make.com offers a certification program and regular webinars to help users enhance their automation skills.
N8N’s documentation leans heavily toward technical users, reflecting its developer-focused audience. While thorough, it assumes a higher level of technical expertise, which may pose challenges for less-experienced users. The platform also benefits from a growing library of community-created content, such as custom node guides and integration instructions.
Security and compliance are essential for enterprise automation, and Make.com delivers with features like single sign-on (SSO) integration for providers such as Okta, Azure AD, and Google Workspace. The platform also includes audit trails for tracking user actions, workflow executions, and data access. It adheres to SOC 2 Type II standards and provides data processing agreements to comply with GDPR. Enterprise plans further enhance security with role-based access controls and team collaboration tools.
In contrast, N8N’s security measures depend heavily on how the platform is deployed. Self-hosted installations give organizations complete control over security, data storage, and compliance configurations. While this flexibility allows businesses to meet virtually any compliance requirement, it also places the responsibility for setup and maintenance on the organization. For users of N8N’s cloud offering, basic security features are included, but advanced controls required by larger enterprises are less comprehensive.
Reliable business continuity is another key consideration. Make.com handles backups and disaster recovery automatically through its cloud infrastructure. The platform ensures data redundancy across multiple regions and offers service level agreements (SLAs) for uptime and data availability. Users can export workflow configurations, but Make.com’s infrastructure team manages data recovery and continuity planning.
For N8N, the approach to business continuity depends on deployment. Self-hosted users must implement their own backup strategies, disaster recovery plans, and data protection measures. While this provides maximum control, it also demands significant technical resources and expertise. Self-hosted users are responsible for managing server failures, scaling, and data corruption independently.
Latenode strikes a balance between enterprise-level support and technical adaptability. The platform offers dedicated customer success teams and comprehensive documentation that caters to both visual workflow builders and advanced coders. With features like audit trails, role-based access controls, and compliance tools, Latenode meets operational and regulatory needs. Additionally, execution history tracking and detailed logging ensure both reliability and transparency, making it a robust choice for businesses seeking a flexible yet secure automation solution.
Selecting the right platform, whether N8N or Make.com, depends on aligning its features with your organization's technical resources, growth plans, and operational needs. Evaluating your business through three key factors - company size and resources, technical expertise, and automation complexity - can simplify this decision. Each platform caters to specific organizational profiles, and understanding these distinctions helps avoid costly missteps in automation efforts. Below, we outline how different business types can benefit from each platform's strengths.
For startups, the focus is on speed and efficiency, prioritizing quick wins over intricate customization. Automation needs are typically straightforward, such as integrating customer data across platforms or managing social media workflows.
Make.com is ideal for startups without dedicated technical teams. Its user-friendly interface allows non-technical staff to build workflows quickly, often within hours. Common tasks like syncing CRM systems with email marketing tools or automating social media posts can be achieved using Make.com's pre-designed templates and modules.
However, startups with technical expertise, such as those with technical founders or engineering hires, might prefer N8N. Its open-source nature offers flexibility for unique workflows and cost savings, provided there’s technical know-how for setup and maintenance. That said, for most small businesses, Make.com's predictable pricing often outweighs the hidden costs of managing N8N, such as server upkeep and technical labor.
As businesses grow, automation needs become more complex, often spanning multiple departments. At this stage, balancing advanced functionality with ease of use is critical.
Make.com is well-suited for mid-size companies due to its comprehensive integration library and enterprise-friendly features like team collaboration tools and audit trails. These capabilities enable organizations to manage diverse software ecosystems while maintaining operational efficiency.
On the other hand, N8N is a strong option for mid-size companies with specific technical demands, such as custom API integrations, complex data transformations, or compliance needs that require self-hosted solutions. However, this path requires dedicated technical resources and a clear cost-benefit analysis to justify the added complexity.
For large organizations, priorities shift to data governance, compliance, cost management at scale, and seamless integration with existing IT infrastructure.
N8N's open-source model is particularly appealing for enterprises that value vendor independence and complete control over their automation processes. This is especially beneficial in regulated industries where data sovereignty is crucial. With internal IT teams to manage deployment, security, and maintenance, enterprises can leverage N8N’s capabilities to handle complex workflows and custom scripting. Additionally, N8N’s self-hosted setup can offer cost advantages for high-volume operations.
Make.com, however, remains a strong contender for enterprises seeking rapid deployment and standardized workflows across departments. Its managed infrastructure eliminates operational overhead, and its extensive library of pre-built integrations accelerates the implementation of common business processes.
Technical expertise plays a significant role in determining the best platform, regardless of company size.
Certain industries have unique needs that make one platform more suitable than the other:
As your business evolves, it’s essential to consider how your chosen platform can scale and adapt. Migration flexibility varies between platforms, so understanding potential vendor lock-in is crucial. A phased approach - starting with core workflows and gradually expanding - can help evaluate the platform under real-world conditions before committing to more complex implementations.
While N8N and Make.com each have their strengths, Latenode bridges the gap by combining the best of both. It offers the visual simplicity of Make.com alongside the customization and cost transparency valued by N8N users. This hybrid approach eliminates the need to compromise between ease of use and advanced functionality, making it a compelling alternative for businesses of all sizes.
Latenode brings together user-friendly design and advanced customization, blending Make.com's visual simplicity with N8N's technical depth.
Latenode integrates the ease of Make.com's drag-and-drop interface with the coding capabilities of N8N. This allows non-technical users to create workflows visually, while developers can write custom JavaScript, access over 1 million NPM packages, and build complex automations - all without worrying about server management.
This dual functionality means marketing teams can automate tasks like lead nurturing through visual tools, while technical teams handle advanced tasks such as data transformations and API integrations - all within the same platform. By doing so, Latenode eliminates the steep learning curve of coding-heavy platforms and the constraints of purely visual tools, creating a balanced solution for diverse needs.
Latenode’s managed infrastructure removes the hassle of self-hosted solutions, sparing users from tasks like server maintenance, DevOps management, and security updates.
It also tackles the limitations of other platforms by allowing users to run custom scripts, implement advanced conditional logic, perform headless browser automation, and use its built-in database. With clear and predictable pricing, it avoids the unexpected costs that can arise with operation-based pricing models.
The practical advantages of Latenode shine through in real-world scenarios. For instance, a mid-sized e-commerce business needed to automate order processing across Shopify, Salesforce, and custom inventory systems. Other platforms posed challenges with hosting and running custom scripts. Latenode provided a solution by enabling the company to design workflows visually, integrate various systems, and apply custom business rules. As a result, they reduced setup time by 40% and ongoing costs by 30%.
This example highlights how Latenode's hybrid approach effectively addresses real business needs, delivering both ease of use and advanced capabilities without locking users into a specific vendor or requiring specialized technical expertise.
Latenode’s migration tools make it easy to transfer existing workflows while upgrading automation capabilities. Companies can retain their established processes while benefiting from features like AI model integration, headless browser automation, and structured data management.
Latenode’s architecture supports seamless workflow expansion, eliminating the need for costly migrations as businesses grow. Its flexible deployment options and tiered plans cater to startups, mid-size businesses, and large enterprises, ensuring that automation solutions can evolve alongside organizational needs.
Rather than choosing between technical complexity and feature limitations, Latenode offers a unified platform that grows with your business, providing a comprehensive solution for automation at any scale.
When deciding between N8N and Make.com, your choice will largely depend on factors like your team's technical skills, budget, and the complexity of your automation requirements.
Opt for N8N if you have a development team ready to handle customizations, need advanced features like JavaScript functions and custom nodes, or want the flexibility of an open-source platform. Self-hosting N8N can be a cost-efficient option for managing large-scale automations, but keep in mind the added responsibility of maintaining servers and managing the technical infrastructure.
Go with Make.com if simplicity and convenience are your priorities. Its extensive library of pre-built integrations and a cloud-based setup make it ideal for teams looking for quick deployment without the need for technical expertise. With plans starting at $9/month for 10,000 operations [6], Make.com offers a straightforward and user-friendly solution.
The difference between these platforms is also reflected in their pricing structures. For example, N8N's cloud plan starts at $24/month for 2,500 executions, while self-hosting introduces additional technical demands [4].
For organizations seeking a balanced approach, Latenode serves as a compelling alternative. It combines an intuitive visual interface with powerful customization options, such as JavaScript support, headless browser automation, and an integrated database. Unlike N8N, Latenode doesn't require self-hosting expertise, and it overcomes the customization limitations often associated with Make.com. This makes it a practical choice for teams looking to streamline automation without compromising on flexibility or control.
Next steps for implementation: Begin with a pilot project focusing on 2–3 key workflows. This will help you evaluate the complexity of your needs, document technical requirements, and plan for future scaling. Additionally, assess migration challenges early, as switching platforms later can involve significant rework of your workflows.
As automation tools continue to evolve, finding the right balance between ease of use and advanced functionality is essential for long-term success. Careful platform selection now can save time and resources down the road.
Self-hosted workflow automation platforms allow businesses to maintain complete control over their data. This control enables companies to implement tailored security measures and adhere to strict compliance requirements. These platforms are particularly useful for industries with demanding regulatory standards. However, managing them effectively requires substantial technical expertise and resources, which can be a challenge for some organizations.
In contrast, cloud-based platforms provide convenience by handling security and compliance features on behalf of the user. They simplify setup and ongoing maintenance, making them an attractive option for businesses looking for ease of use. That said, they may offer limited customization and could present difficulties for organizations with specific regulatory needs, especially when data storage is outside their direct control.
Ultimately, self-hosted platforms offer more control and flexibility but come with higher demands on resources and expertise. Cloud-based solutions, while easier to manage, trade off some customization and control in favor of convenience.
N8N and Make.com approach pricing in ways that suit different user needs and scenarios.
N8N operates on a workflow execution-based pricing model. This approach can be economical for smaller-scale operations, especially when workflows are simple and limited in volume. Additionally, N8N offers a self-hosting option, which can help lower ongoing costs. However, self-hosting comes with its own challenges, requiring technical expertise and the resources to manage infrastructure effectively.
Make.com, on the other hand, uses a pricing model based on the number of operations within workflows. This structure can make it easy to scale quickly, particularly for users just starting with automation. That said, as workflows become more complex or usage increases significantly, costs can climb quickly, potentially making it less practical for sustained, large-scale automation without careful cost management.
In summary, N8N is a good fit for teams with technical skills who want more control over costs, while Make.com prioritizes simplicity but may lead to higher expenses as automation demands grow.
When choosing a workflow automation tool, businesses often need to balance ease of use with customization options. Tools designed with simple, user-friendly interfaces are excellent for quick implementation and require minimal training, making them well-suited for teams with limited technical skills. In contrast, platforms offering extensive customization can manage more intricate or specialized workflows but may demand a higher level of technical expertise.
To decide which option is best, evaluate your team's technical capabilities, the complexity of your workflows, and whether your priorities lean more toward flexibility or simplicity. Finding the right balance among these factors ensures the tool aligns with your organization's specific needs.
Swap Apps
Application 1
Application 2
Step 1: Choose a Trigger
Step 2: Choose an Action
No credit card needed
Without restriction
