General
George Miloradovich
Researcher, Copywriter & Usecase Interviewer
February 25, 2025
A low-code platform blending no-code simplicity with full-code power 🚀
Get started free
February 25, 2025
•
8
min read

ChatGPT vs Grok 3: Comprehensive Performance Comparison of Leading AI Models

George Miloradovich
Researcher, Copywriter & Usecase Interviewer
Table of contents

Quick Summary: ChatGPT excels in creativity, content creation, and general-purpose tasks, while Grok 3 is better for technical reasoning, STEM tasks, and real-time data analysis. Choosing the right model depends on your requirements.

Key Differences:

  • Core Strengths:
    • ChatGPT: Problem-solving, creative writing, customer engagement.
    • Grok 3: STEM-focused tasks, technical analysis, real-time data access.
  • Performance Highlights:
    • Grok 3: 1400 ELO on LMArena, 93.3% on AIME 2025, 1.2× faster in coding tasks.
    • ChatGPT: Strong in nuanced problem-solving and creative applications.
  • Features:
    • ChatGPT: Plugin system, DALL-E 3 integration, broad accessibility.
    • Grok 3: Think Mode, Big Brain Mode, DeepSearch for real-time X and web data.
  • Pricing:
    • ChatGPT: Free tier available, paid plans start at $20/month.
    • Grok 3: No free tier, starts at $30/month.

Quick Comparison Table:

Feature ChatGPT Grok 3
Core Strength Creativity, content creation Technical reasoning, STEM
Speed Standard 1.2× faster in coding
Data Access Web browsing Real-time via X
Parameters Not disclosed 2.7 trillion
Context Window Model dependent 128,000 tokens
Free Tier Yes No
Best For Marketing, creative tasks Research, technical tasks

Both AI models are powerful but cater to different user needs. Businesses should assess their goals and choose accordingly.

Technical Capabilities

Data and Size Specs

Grok 3 stands out with 2.7 trillion parameters, 12.8 trillion training tokens, and a massive 128,000-token context window . In contrast, ChatGPT, built on GPT and fine-tuned with RLHF , keeps its parameter details under wraps but leverages diverse training data.

Specification Grok 3 ChatGPT
Parameters 2.7 trillion Not disclosed
Training Tokens 12.8 trillion Not disclosed
Context Window 128,000 tokens Model dependent
Computing Power 200,000 GPUs Not disclosed
Training Data Cutoff February 2025 2023 (GPT-4)

These features lay the groundwork for Grok 3's advanced text analysis capabilities.

Text Processing Skills

Grok 3 achieved 93% on AIME '25 and 85% on GPQA . Its 'Think Mode' handles complex scenarios, like the trolley problem, in just 52 seconds .

"Grok 3 is an AI model that's causing a buzz in the AI industry. It has impressive generation and reasoning capabilities, which can be useful for a variety of applications." - Niyati Mahale, Content Writer @Writesonic

ChatGPT, on the other hand, excels at tasks requiring creativity and nuanced problem-solving. It maintains context effectively while delivering natural, coherent responses across many fields.

Both models stand out not just for their processing skills but also for their ability to stay current with knowledge.

Knowledge Updates

Grok 3 employs continuous learning, with data updated until February 2025. Its DeepSearch mode scans web content and X posts in real time . ChatGPT, by contrast, relies on periodic updates and Bing integration for accessing current information .

Grok 3 is also faster, offering 25% quicker responses and 15% greater accuracy in natural language tasks compared to similar models . Ethan Mollick, a Wharton AI professor, remarked:

"I think Grok 3 came in right at expectations... speed is a moat, compute still matters, no obvious secret sauce to making a frontier model if you have talent & chips."

Performance Tests

Test Results

Recent benchmarks highlight key differences in how Grok 3 and ChatGPT handle specialized tasks. Grok 3 scored 93.3% accuracy on AIME 2025 mathematical assessments and 84.6% on GPQA science evaluations.

Task Category Grok 3 ChatGPT Performance Gap
Mathematics (AIME 2025) 93.3% Not disclosed –
Science (GPQA) 84.6% Not disclosed –
Coding (LiveCodeBench) 79.4% 72.9% +6.5%
Code Generation Speed 0.8s 1.0s 1.2x faster
Debug Session Efficiency +30% Baseline Noticeable boost

Software developers using Grok 3 for code analysis report a 30% improvement in workflow efficiency. These benchmarks provide a foundation for understanding how each model excels in specific tasks.

Task Performance Analysis

The performance data highlights how these models can impact business automation and workflow processes. Grok 3's "Think Mode" stands out in tackling complex analytical tasks, though it does require more processing time.

  • Code Generation and Analysis
    Grok 3 achieves an average response time of 0.8 seconds for code generation, resolving complex programming challenges 15% more effectively compared to earlier benchmarks. Its optimized transformer architecture processes longer sequences more efficiently.
  • Real-time Data Processing
    While ChatGPT shines in creative and general-purpose tasks, Grok 3's DeepSearch capability is better suited for analyzing current data. This makes it especially useful for professionals in research and engineering.

These results suggest that while both models are highly capable, their strengths align with different types of tasks and levels of complexity.

Extra Features

ChatGPT Plugin System

ChatGPT

ChatGPT's plugin system allows direct connections with external tools, such as DALL-E 3 for image generation, enabling expanded functionality through third-party services . This setup supports smoother workflows and adds versatility to operations .

The platform offers two distinct modes:

Mode Primary Function Best Use Case
Search Mode Web browsing and information gathering Research and content development
Reason Mode Structured problem-solving Complex decision-making and analysis

On the other hand, Grok 3 provides its own modes tailored for technical and data-heavy tasks.

Grok 3 Special Features

Grok

Grok 3 includes three advanced modes designed for specific needs :

  • Think Mode: Offers detailed, step-by-step reasoning, ideal for STEM professionals who need clear problem-solving methods.
  • Big Brain Mode: Utilizes more computational power to tackle complex analytical problems.
  • DeepSearch: Conducts real-time web and X platform searches, gathering current information and user-generated content.

Grok 3 can analyze X user profiles, posts, and various file types like PDFs and images, while simultaneously pulling contextual data from both the web and the X platform .

Setup Options

Both platforms provide customization options to meet enterprise requirements. Grok AI focuses on business-specific needs with robust integration capabilities :

Integration Category Supported Platforms
CRM Systems Salesforce, HubSpot
ERP Solutions SAP, Oracle
Financial Software QuickBooks
Development Tools VS Code

These integrations help streamline tasks such as customer service automation and financial reporting . While ChatGPT offers integration through its Enterprise plan, Grok AI provides broader API customization, making it easier to embed AI into existing systems .

For developers, Grok AI's VS Code integration improves coding workflows and supports standard API protocols for seamless application integration . This makes it a strong choice for organizations needing tailored technical solutions without disrupting existing processes.

sbb-itb-23997f1

Is Grok 3 Worth it? My Honest Review & Comparison to ChatGPT

Usage and Costs

Let’s dive into the practical aspects of using ChatGPT and Grok 3, focusing on their interfaces, pricing, and access methods.

User Interface

ChatGPT keeps things simple with a clean design that supports natural, conversational interactions. Within just five days of its launch, it attracted 1 million users .

"What ChatGPT shows us is that products that have a simple UI, a small learning curve, and playful discovery features can create an intuitive, frictionless experience for users" .

Grok 3, on the other hand, offers three interaction modes - Think, Big Brain, and DeepSearch - each designed for specific tasks . While this setup provides more control, users need to invest time in learning how to navigate these modes.

Price Comparison

The two platforms have very different pricing models:

Plan Type ChatGPT Grok 3
Free Tier Available Not available
Basic Paid Plus: $20/month SuperGrok: $30/month
Advanced Pro: $200/month X Premium+: $40/month
Team/Enterprise $25-30/user/month Not available
Enterprise Custom pricing Not available

While ChatGPT offers a free tier and a range of paid plans, Grok 3 lacks a free option and has fewer pricing tiers.

Access Methods

ChatGPT is available across multiple platforms, including a web interface, mobile apps for iOS and Android, and API integration. Its Enterprise plan adds features like higher message limits, a larger context window, enhanced security, and dedicated account management . The Team plan also includes collaborative tools like an admin console and unified billing .

Grok 3 is mostly tied to the X platform. Users can access it through the X Premium+ subscription ($40/month) or the SuperGrok subscription ($30/month) . While xAI has announced plans to introduce API access for developers , it currently offers fewer integration options compared to ChatGPT’s ecosystem.

Final Analysis

Main Differences

ChatGPT stands out for its ability to handle creative tasks, bolstered by features like DALL·E 3 integration and broad accessibility options . On the other hand, Grok 3 excels in technical performance, particularly in STEM-related applications, where it consistently achieves higher benchmarks . These differences make each model suitable for specific scenarios, depending on user needs.

Best Uses

Matching the strengths of each model to user needs helps clarify their ideal applications:

User Type Recommended Model Key Benefits
STEM Professionals Grok 3 Strong technical reasoning, real-time data access, 79.4% LiveCodeBench performance
Content Creators ChatGPT Flexible content creation, DALL·E 3 integration, extensive API options
Business Users ChatGPT Cost-efficient automation, reducing expenses by 30–40%
Data Analysts Grok 3 Advanced DeepSearch mode, real-time X data integration

For instance, ChatGPT's API can cut support team costs by over $10,000 per month through automated ticket handling . Meanwhile, Grok 3 shines in research-heavy tasks and real-time data analysis thanks to its specialized modes .

Next Steps

Given these distinctions, businesses should choose a model based on their operational priorities. The AI field continues to evolve rapidly, offering exciting advancements for both platforms. Andrej Karpathy, former Director of AI at Tesla, remarked that Grok 3 "feels somewhere around the state of the art territory of OpenAI's strongest models (o1-pro, $200/month), and slightly better than DeepSeek-R1 and Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking" .

Key factors to evaluate include:

  • Infrastructure needs and API expenses
  • Compatibility with current systems
  • Specific use cases (technical vs. creative)
  • Budget limitations and potential ROI

This competitive environment fuels ongoing improvements, with both platforms likely to expand their capabilities while maintaining their individual strengths.

Related Blog Posts

Application

Try now

Related Blogs

Use case

Backed by