.png)
.svg){kind=icon}
Ready-to-go AI agents are available on Latenode 🚀
Quick Summary: ChatGPT excels in creativity, content creation, and general-purpose tasks, while Grok 3 is better for technical reasoning, STEM tasks, and real-time data analysis. Choosing the right model depends on your requirements. If you need a model for business analysis and automation, opt ChatGPT, because Grok 3 doesn’t have an API.
Core Strengths:
Performance Highlights:
Features:
Pricing:
Latenode integrates effortlessly with all major ChatGPT models — no API tokens or account details required. It also makes connecting to your databases, CRMs, and messaging apps a breeze. See how you can use our AI automation tools to streamline, enhance, and boost your workflow!
| Feature | ChatGPT | Grok 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Core Strength | Creativity, content creation | Technical reasoning, STEM |
| Speed | Standard | 1.2× faster in coding |
| Data Access | Web browsing | Real-time via X |
| Parameters | Not disclosed | 2.7 trillion |
| Context Window | Model dependent | 128,000 tokens |
| Free Tier | Yes | No |
| Best For | Marketing, creative tasks | Research, technical tasks |
Both AI models are powerful but cater to different user needs. Businesses should assess their goals and choose accordingly.
Grok 3 stands out with 2.7 trillion parameters, 12.8 trillion training tokens, and a massive 128,000-token context window [3]. In contrast, ChatGPT, built on GPT and fine-tuned with RLHF [2], keeps its parameter details under wraps but leverages diverse training data.
| Specification | Grok 3 | ChatGPT 4o |
|---|---|---|
| Parameters | 2.7 trillion | 1.7 trillion |
| Training Tokens | 12.8 trillion | Not disclosed |
| Context Window | 128,000 tokens | 128,000 tokens |
| Computing Power | 200,000 GPUs | Not disclosed |
| Training Data Cutoff | February 2025 | 2024 (GPT-4o) |
These features lay the groundwork for Grok 3's advanced text analysis capabilities.
⚙️ Want to plug Grok-like analysis into your workflow?
Here's how to connect AI reasoning to real data streams and visualize results — no code needed. 👉 Use this scenario →
Grok 3 achieved 93% on AIME '25 and 85% on GPQA [4]. Its 'Think Mode' handles complex scenarios, like the trolley problem, in just 52 seconds [1].
"Grok 3 is an AI model that's causing a buzz in the AI industry. It has impressive generation and reasoning capabilities, which can be useful for a variety of applications." - Niyati Mahale, Content Writer @Writesonic [4]
ChatGPT, on the other hand, excels at tasks requiring creativity and nuanced problem-solving. It maintains context effectively while delivering natural, coherent responses across many fields.
Both models stand out not just for their processing skills but also for their ability to stay current with knowledge.
You can always use ChatGPT 4o to automate your content creation workflow, saving countless hours you spend to draft a copy for social media, create an article for a blog, or reply to an email. Discover how AI creates articles for under five cents each, saving you valuable time on research, analysis, and writing.
Grok 3 employs continuous learning, with data updated until February 2025. Its DeepSearch mode scans web content and X posts in real time [3][4]. ChatGPT, by contrast, relies on periodic updates and Bing integration for accessing current information [1].
Grok 3 is also faster, offering 25% quicker responses and 15% greater accuracy in natural language tasks compared to similar models [3]. Ethan Mollick, a Wharton AI professor, remarked:
"I think Grok 3 came in right at expectations... speed is a moat, compute still matters, no obvious secret sauce to making a frontier model if you have talent & chips." [5]
Recent benchmarks highlight key differences in how Grok 3 and ChatGPT handle specialized tasks. Grok 3 scored 93.3% accuracy on AIME 2025 mathematical assessments and 84.6% on GPQA science evaluations[1].
| Task Category | Grok 3 | ChatGPT | Performance Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mathematics (AIME 2025) | 93.3% | Not disclosed | – |
| Science (GPQA) | 84.6% | Not disclosed | – |
| Coding (LiveCodeBench) | 79.4% | 72.9% | +6.5% |
| Code Generation Speed | 0.8s | 1.0s | 1.2x faster |
| Debug Session Efficiency | +30% | Baseline | Noticeable boost |
Software developers using Grok 3 for code analysis report a 30% improvement in workflow efficiency[7]. These benchmarks provide a foundation for understanding how each model excels in specific tasks.
The performance data highlights how these models can impact business automation and workflow processes. Grok 3's "Think Mode" stands out in tackling complex analytical tasks, though it does require more processing time.
These results suggest that while both models are highly capable, their strengths align with different types of tasks and levels of complexity.
By the way, we have a series of templates for analyzing data, creating content, and searching for it. For example, here’s our free tool that helps you automate trend monitoring. Search the web for the most up-to-date insights on your chosen topic with the help of AI and then send them anywhere you like — your messenger, Slack channel, etc. Check it out:
ChatGPT's plugin system allows direct connections with external tools, such as DALL-E 3 for image generation, enabling expanded functionality through third-party services [6]. This setup supports smoother workflows and adds versatility to operations [1].
The platform offers two distinct modes:
| Mode | Primary Function | Best Use Case |
|---|---|---|
| Search Mode | Web browsing and information gathering | Research and content development |
| Reason Mode | Structured problem-solving | Complex decision-making and analysis |
On the other hand, Grok 3 provides its own modes tailored for technical and data-heavy tasks.
Grok 3 includes three advanced modes designed for specific needs [1]:
Grok 3 can analyze X user profiles, posts, and various file types like PDFs and images, while simultaneously pulling contextual data from both the web and the X platform.
Both platforms provide customization options to meet enterprise requirements. Grok AI focuses on business-specific needs with robust integration capabilities [8]:
| Integration Category | Supported Platforms |
|---|---|
| CRM Systems | Salesforce, HubSpot |
| ERP Solutions | SAP, Oracle |
| Financial Software | QuickBooks |
| Development Tools | VS Code |
These integrations help streamline tasks such as customer service automation and financial reporting [8]. While ChatGPT offers integration through its Enterprise plan, Grok AI provides broader API customization, making it easier to embed AI into existing systems [8].
For developers, Grok AI's VS Code integration improves coding workflows and supports standard API protocols for seamless application integration [7]. This makes it a strong choice for organizations needing tailored technical solutions without disrupting existing processes.
Remember: having the right tool at the right time can mean the difference between insight and overload, iteration and inertia.
Latenode can help with that. With native support for real-time AI integration, dynamic branching, and human-in-the-loop decisions, our low-code platform helps teams turn model output into immediate, actionable workflows — without writing a single line of code.
Let’s dive into the practical aspects of using ChatGPT and Grok 3, focusing on their interfaces, pricing, and access methods.
ChatGPT keeps things simple with a clean design that supports natural, conversational interactions. Within just five days of its launch, it attracted 1 million users [11].
"What ChatGPT shows us is that products that have a simple UI, a small learning curve, and playful discovery features can create an intuitive, frictionless experience for users" [11].
Grok 3, on the other hand, offers three interaction modes - Think, Big Brain, and DeepSearch - each designed for specific tasks [1]. While this setup provides more control, users need to invest time in learning how to navigate these modes.
The two platforms have very different pricing models:
| Plan Type | ChatGPT | Grok 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Free Tier | Available | Available |
| Basic Paid | Plus: $20/month | SuperGrok: $30/month |
| Advanced | Pro: $200/month | X Premium+: $40/month |
| Team/Enterprise | $25-30/user/month | Not available |
| Enterprise | Custom pricing | Not available |
While ChatGPT offers a free tier and a range of paid plans, Grok 3 lacks a free option and has fewer pricing tiers.
ChatGPT is available across multiple platforms, including a web interface, mobile apps for iOS and Android, and API integration. Its Enterprise plan adds features like higher message limits, a larger context window, enhanced security, and dedicated account management [6][9]. The Team plan also includes collaborative tools like an admin console and unified billing [9].
Grok 3 is mostly tied to the X platform. Users can access it through the X Premium+ subscription ($40/month) or the SuperGrok subscription ($30/month) [10]. While xAI has announced plans to introduce API access for developers [12], it currently offers fewer integration options compared to ChatGPT’s ecosystem.
Latenode allows you to integrate all the best AI models without API to code setup to automate things like communication, content, and data analysis. Best of all, you can integrate your favorite tools with our no-code editor. Why not start exploring our 300+ integrations? Check them out to learn where and how to get started!
ChatGPT stands out for its ability to handle creative tasks, bolstered by features like DALL·E 3 integration and broad accessibility options [1]. On the other hand, Grok 3 excels in technical performance, particularly in STEM-related applications, where it consistently achieves higher benchmarks [1]. These differences make each model suitable for specific scenarios, depending on user needs.
Matching the strengths of each model to user needs helps clarify their ideal applications:
| User Type | Recommended Model | Key Benefits |
|---|---|---|
| STEM Professionals | Grok 3 | Strong technical reasoning, real-time data access, 79.4% LiveCodeBench performance [1] |
| Content Creators | ChatGPT | Flexible content creation, DALL·E 3 integration, extensive API options [1] |
| Business Users | ChatGPT | Cost-efficient automation, reducing expenses by 30–40% [13] |
| Data Analysts | Grok 3 | Advanced DeepSearch mode, real-time X data integration [1] |
For instance, ChatGPT's API can cut support team costs by over $10,000 per month through automated ticket handling [13]. Meanwhile, Grok 3 shines in research-heavy tasks and real-time data analysis thanks to its specialized modes [1].
By the way, your support team can build a chatbot on Latenode using ChatGPT and Google Sheets. The coolest part is that it actually remembers previous conversations and gives smart, context aware answers! Check out our free template to get started!
Given these distinctions, businesses should choose a model based on their operational priorities. The AI field continues to evolve rapidly, offering exciting advancements for both platforms. Andrej Karpathy, former Director of AI at Tesla, remarked that Grok 3 "feels somewhere around the state of the art territory of OpenAI's strongest models (o1-pro, $200/month), and slightly better than DeepSeek-R1 and Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking" [5].
Key factors to evaluate include:
This competitive environment fuels ongoing improvements, with both platforms likely to expand their capabilities while maintaining their individual strengths.
✳️ Once you’ve assessed these criteria, the next step is action:
👉 Try building your own scenario using ChatGPT, Grok-like logic, or Gemini — all in one flow, with human-in-the-loop support.
Start your 14-day free trial on Latenode →
Swap Apps
Application 1
Application 2
Step 1: Choose a Trigger
Step 2: Choose an Action
No credit card needed
Without restriction
