.png)
.svg){kind=icon}
March 3, 2025
•
10
min read
Claude 3.7 Sonnet vs. Google Gemini: Accuracy and Creativity in AI Automation
George Miloradovich
Researcher, Copywriter & Usecase Interviewer
Claude 3.7 Sonnet and Google Gemini are two leading AI tools, each excelling in different areas of automation. Here's a quick summary to help you decide:
| Feature | Claude 3.7 Sonnet | Google Gemini |
|---|---|---|
| Context Window | 200K tokens | 2M tokens |
| Multimodal Support | Text, code | Text, code, voice, video |
| Input Cost | $3.00 per million tokens | $3.50 per million tokens |
| Output Cost | $15.00 per million tokens | $10.50 per million tokens |
| Retail Task Accuracy | 81.2% | Not available |
| Coding Accuracy | 62.3% | Platform-dependent |
Key takeaway: Choose Claude for precise reasoning and enterprise tasks, and Gemini for multimodal capabilities and large-scale operations.
Let’s dive deeper into their features, accuracy, and real-world applications.
When assessing AI performance, it's crucial to consider both the precision of its outputs and the broader impact on business operations. While conventional metrics work for well-defined tasks, generative AI requires a more refined approach. Key evaluation criteria include:
These metrics form the foundation for evaluating the accuracy of Claude 3.7 Sonnet and Google Gemini.
Claude 3.7 Sonnet demonstrates strong accuracy, particularly with its 'Thinking Mode', which enhances its ability to handle complex tasks . Here's how it performs across key areas:
| Task Type | Standard Mode | Extended Thinking Mode |
|---|---|---|
| Graduate-level Reasoning | 68.0% | 84.8% |
| Math Problem-Solving | 82.2% | 96.2% |
| Software Engineering | 62.3% | 70.3% |
| Retail Tool Use | 81.2% | – |
Additionally, the model is effective at blocking prompt injections in 88% of cases, with a low false positive rate of just 0.5% .
Google Gemini 2.0 Pro also delivers strong results, excelling in specific benchmarks :
One standout feature of Gemini is its 2 million token context window, which allows it to manage far more complex tasks than Claude's 200,000-token limit .
| Metric | Claude 3.7 Sonnet | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Impact on Automation |
|---|---|---|---|
| MMMU Score | 71.8% | 72.7% | Content Understanding |
| Context Processing | 200K tokens | 2M tokens | Handles Complex Tasks |
| Retail Task Accuracy | 81.2% | Not available | Business Operations |
| Cost per Million Tokens (Input) | $3.00 | $0.10 | Lower Operational Expenses |
| Cost per Million Tokens (Output) | $15.00 | $0.40 | Budget-Friendly Processing |
This side-by-side comparison highlights the strengths of each model in tackling different automation challenges, from precision to cost efficiency.
Handling complex automation requires AI tools that can tackle challenges dynamically and offer effective solutions. Let’s break down how these tools perform in real-world scenarios.
Claude uses two distinct processing modes to generate solutions efficiently:
| Processing Mode | Capabilities | Best Use Cases |
|---|---|---|
| Standard Mode | Quick responses for routine tasks | Everyday automation and simple workflows |
| Extended Thinking | In-depth analysis | Mathematical modeling and engineering |
For example, a Fortune 500 manufacturer utilized Claude to automate 73% of its supply chain risk assessments, saving $12 million. It also reduced code review times from 45 minutes to under 5 minutes .
Gemini 2.0 Pro stands out with its ability to integrate multiple input types - text, images, and audio - thanks to its 2-million token context window. This makes it ideal for analyzing intricate scenarios . In December 2024, Gemini reviewed a five-minute restaurant operations video, delivering insights on efficiency, safety, and inventory management.
Here’s a side-by-side look at the problem-solving features of these tools:
| Feature | Claude 3.7 Sonnet | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Impact on Automation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Reasoning Approach | Hybrid with dual processing modes | Multimodal integration | Offers varied optimization methods |
| Mathematical Problem-Solving | Solves 78% of IMO problems | Strong MATH benchmark performance | Handles advanced calculations |
| Context Processing | 128,000 tokens for reasoning | 2 million token window | Enables broader and deeper analysis |
These tools excel in different ways, with their unique processing styles and context capabilities shaping their roles in business automation.
"Gemini 2.0 improves on previous AI systems by advancing the capabilities of autonomous decision-making through the integration of more sophisticated AI agents that leverage real-time data processing and adaptive learning models" .
Additionally, Claude 3.7 Sonnet has improved its ability to handle ambiguous requests by 31–45% compared to earlier versions .
Low-code platforms play a key role in AI automation, with more than 75% of developers incorporating AI into their daily tasks . Latenode's visual workflow builder simplifies the creation of complex AI processes using a drag-and-drop interface. Its time-based pricing model also helps reduce costs. These features make it easier to evaluate how different AI tools work within low-code environments.
Claude 3.7 Sonnet connects through the Anthropic API, Amazon Bedrock, and Google Cloud's Vertex AI . It offers two modes to improve low-code functionality: a standard mode for routine automation and an extended thinking mode for tackling complex tasks. Access to the extended thinking features requires a premium subscription, priced at $3 per million input tokens and $15 per million output tokens .
Gemini integrates seamlessly, particularly through Gemini Code Assist, which is available in a free tier or an enterprise version. Here's a breakdown of the options:
| Feature | Free Tier | Enterprise Version |
|---|---|---|
| Monthly Code Completions | 180,000 | Unlimited |
| Custom Style Guides | Basic | Advanced |
| IDE Integration | VS Code, JetBrains | Full Suite |
| Pricing | $0 | $45–$54 per user/month |
Gemini's integration with ToolJet supports multimodal AI applications, allowing users to work with text, images, and code through a user-friendly interface .
| Feature | Claude 3.7 Sonnet | Gemini |
|---|---|---|
| API Accessibility | Multi-platform support | Direct integration |
| Workflow Design | Visual builder support | Custom workflow tools |
| Development Tools | Automation-focused | Code-specific features |
| Integration Model | API-based | Platform-native |
"2025 is the year AI shifts from bolt-on to built-in AI across the software development lifecycle (SDLC). As a development platform provider, companies like Google have a leg up on the competition as they have a deeper understanding of developers, DevOps workflows and platforms. Of particular note is Gemini Code Assist's custom style guides that enable enterprises and teams to standardize how Gemini Code Assist is used. The free tier has plenty of cushion, enabling new users to experience the power of AI-augmented development and DevOps."
– Mitch Ashley, VP and Practice Lead, DevOps and Application Development, The Futurum Group
Gemini Code Assist stands out with its strong free tier and customization options, while Claude 3.7 Sonnet offers flexibility across multiple cloud platforms.
Here’s how businesses are putting AI platforms to work and transforming their operations.
Claude 3.7 Sonnet is driving faster workflows across various industries. For example, AES, a global energy company, drastically improved their health and safety audits. What used to take 14 days now gets done in just one hour, thanks to Claude-powered agents .
Palo Alto Networks saw a 20–30% boost in feature development and code implementation speed after integrating Claude 3.7 Sonnet.
"Running Claude on Google Cloud's Vertex AI not only accelerates development projects, it enables us to hardwire security into code before it ships."
Quora’s AI chat platform, Poe, also uses Claude to handle millions of interactions daily.
"We consistently hear from our users about how much they enjoy the intelligence, adaptability, and natural conversational abilities of Anthropic's Claude models. They're relying on these qualities for a wide variety of tasks, from the complex to the creative. By leveraging Claude with Vertex AI's secure and scalable platform, we're able to facilitate millions of daily interactions, ensuring both speed and reliability."
These examples show how Claude 3.7 Sonnet is being used to tackle challenges across industries.
Sports Basement uses Gemini to enhance customer service. By integrating Gemini for Google Workspace, they cut the time spent drafting messages by 30–35%. They also replaced over 100 email templates with AI-generated responses that feel more natural .
In technical documentation, FinQuery has found Gemini to be a game-changer.
"Gemini for Google Workspace is becoming a part of our way of life. I personally leveraged Gemini in Google Docs to create a one-page summary of observability and monitoring tools."
This tool helped create a polished, high-level summary, freeing up time for more critical tasks.
Trellix utilizes Gemini in Google Meet for automated note-taking and action item tracking. Integration with Google Docs allows them to instantly transcribe and organize meeting minutes .
These use cases demonstrate Gemini’s ability to simplify business communication and documentation tasks.
Here’s how Claude 3.7 Sonnet and Gemini 1.5 Pro stack up in terms of cost and performance:
| Metric | Claude 3.7 Sonnet | Gemini 1.5 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Input Token Cost | $3.00 per million | $3.50 per million |
| Output Token Cost | $15.00 per million | $10.50 per million |
| Context Window | 200K tokens | 2M tokens |
| Task-Specific Accuracy | 81.2% in retail tasks | Varies by application |
| Software Engineering Accuracy | 62.3% (SWE-bench Verified) | Platform-dependent |
For workflows that involve a lot of output, Gemini offers better pricing. However, Claude 3.7 Sonnet remains cost-effective for input-heavy tasks. When it comes to performance, Claude achieves 81.2% accuracy in retail tasks and 58.4% in airline-related operations .
"Our auditors previously spent 14 days completing each audit process. Now, with our Claude-powered agents on Vertex AI, the same work is completed in just one hour. I love the accuracy of Anthropic's Claude models and the security and advanced AI tools that Google Cloud provides to utilize these models."
These examples underline how businesses are focusing on both accuracy and security in their AI automation efforts.
Claude 3.7 Sonnet achieves a coding accuracy of 62.3%, which can improve to 70.3% when using a custom scaffold . It also performs well in retail-focused tasks, with an accuracy of 81.2% .
On the other hand, Gemini 1.5 Pro offers a much larger context window of 2M tokens compared to Claude's 200K tokens . It also includes voice and video processing capabilities, which Claude lacks .
| Feature | Claude 3.7 Sonnet | Gemini 1.5 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Context Window | 200K tokens | 2M tokens |
| Input Cost | $3.00 per million tokens | $3.50 per million tokens |
| Output Cost | $15.00 per million tokens | $10.50 per million tokens |
| Multimodal Support | Text only | Text, voice, video |
| Integration Options | Claude.ai, API, Bedrock, Vertex AI | AI Studio, Vertex AI |
The differences between these tools make them suitable for different types of tasks and workflows.
Claude 3.7 Sonnet shines in:
"Just as humans use a single brain for both quick responses and deep reflection, we believe reasoning should be an integrated capability of frontier models rather than a separate model entirely." – Anthropic
Gemini 1.5 Pro is better equipped for:
These strengths make it easier for organizations to align each tool with their unique automation goals.
Recent trends highlight the complementary strengths of these tools. Claude's hybrid reasoning capabilities and Gemini's multimodal processing represent major advancements in AI automation .
"Each of these models excels in different areas, reflecting the diverse strategies employed by their developers. The choice between these models should be based on specific needs and the type of tasks intended for them."
Additionally, the rise of low-code platforms like Latenode allows more users to leverage AI without needing deep technical expertise. As automation continues to evolve, choosing the right tool becomes crucial for creating efficient, scalable workflows.
