.png)
.svg){kind=icon}
March 3, 2025
•
8
min read
Claude 3.7 Sonnet vs. Claude 3.5 Opus: Major Leaps in Coding and Reasoning
George Miloradovich
Researcher, Copywriter & Usecase Interviewer
Looking to choose between Claude 3.7 Sonnet and Claude 3.5 Opus? Here's the quick takeaway: Claude 3.7 Sonnet delivers faster coding, smarter reasoning, and better cost-efficiency compared to Claude 3.5 Opus. It’s the go-to model for handling complex tasks, improving automation, and saving time.
| Feature | Claude 3.7 Sonnet | Claude 3.5 Opus |
|---|---|---|
| SWE-bench Accuracy | 62.3% | 49.0% |
| Task Completion Speed | 45+ minutes saved | Standard |
| Retail Task Accuracy | 81.2% | 71.5% |
| Cost per Million Tokens | $3 (input), $15 (output) | $15 (input), $75 (output) |
Bottom Line: If you need advanced coding and reasoning capabilities at a lower cost, Claude 3.7 Sonnet is the clear winner. Dive into the article for detailed comparisons and real-world examples.
Claude 3.7 Sonnet brings new tools designed to streamline and improve coding workflows. The Claude Code command-line tool allows developers to handle complex tasks more effectively. Its Thinking Mode offers insights into the model's reasoning during code generation and problem-solving, making it easier to understand its approach . This model is particularly strong in areas like test-driven development, large-scale refactoring, managing complex codebases, and full-stack updates. Developers can even control its reasoning process by setting a "thinking budget" to limit token use . With a 200K token context window, Claude 3.7 Sonnet can process large codebases with impressive precision .
"Claude is once again best-in-class for real-world coding tasks, with significant improvements in areas ranging from handling complex codebases to advanced tool use." – Cursor
Now, let’s see how these advanced features compare to the earlier Claude 3.5 Opus.
Claude 3.5 Opus focuses on basic coding support. While it provides standard code completion and simple restructuring, it falls short in handling more intricate development needs. This version operates at nearly half the speed of Claude 3.7 Sonnet and struggles with complex problem-solving. Its strengths are limited to straightforward tasks, making it less effective for demanding workflows.
The difference in performance between Claude 3.7 Sonnet and Claude 3.5 Opus is striking, as shown in the table below:
| Metric | Claude 3.7 Sonnet | Claude 3.5 Opus |
|---|---|---|
| SWE-bench Verified Accuracy | 62.3% | 49.0% |
| Code Problem Resolution | 64% | 38% |
| Development Time Reduction | 45+ minutes saved per task | Standard processing |
| Retail Task Accuracy | 81.2% | Not available |
| Airline Task Accuracy | 58.4% | Not available |
"Claude consistently produced production-ready code with superior design taste and drastically reduced errors." – Canva
These updates not only improve coding efficiency but also support low-code workflow automation, making them particularly useful for platforms like Latenode.
Claude 3.7 Sonnet introduces a standout feature called "Thinking Mode", which provides a detailed, step-by-step reasoning process. This system adjusts its approach based on task complexity, switching between quick responses and more in-depth, multi-step analysis. In this extended mode, it achieves impressive results: 84.8% on GPQA Diamond, 96.5% accuracy on physics problems, and a 96.2% success rate in math .
"Just as humans use a single brain for both quick responses and deep reflection, we believe reasoning should be an integrated capability of frontier models rather than a separate model entirely." – Anthropic
This integrated reasoning approach marks a clear improvement over earlier models.
Unlike Claude 3.7 Sonnet, Claude 3.5 Opus lacks a built-in multi-step reasoning system. Without "Thinking Mode", it provides direct answers, which can fall short when dealing with tasks that require detailed analysis or nuanced understanding.
Benchmark tests highlight the notable gap in reasoning performance between the two models. Claude 3.7 Sonnet scores 68.0% in standard mode on GPQA Diamond, which jumps to 84.8% in extended thinking mode, outperforming OpenAI o1's 78.0% . For instruction-following tasks, it achieves 90.8% in standard mode and 93.2% in extended mode . Extended thinking mode particularly excels, delivering 96.5% accuracy in physics and a 96.2% success rate in math.
Additionally, Claude 3.7 Sonnet reduces unnecessary refusals by 45% compared to prior versions , making it more practical for a range of tasks.
"reported the biggest gains in math, physics, competition coding, and in-depth analysis when using extended thinking" - Vasi Philomin, VP of Generative AI at AWS
These advancements have real-world benefits: 37.2% of users rely on Claude for complex tasks like coding and solving mathematical problems . The clear reasoning steps also help users verify solutions and learn more effectively.
Latenode's integration with Claude models has changed the way teams handle workflow automation. By using its visual workflow builder alongside Claude 3.7 Sonnet, the platform takes advantage of advanced features like hybrid reasoning and Claude Code to deliver more dependable automation.
Compared to its predecessor, Claude 3.5 Opus, the improvements with Claude 3.7 Sonnet are clear. Both versions connect via Latenode's API, but Claude 3.7 Sonnet stands out with 81.2% accuracy in retail tasks and 58.4% accuracy in airline tasks . Pricing is another game-changer: Claude 3.7 Sonnet costs just $3 per million input tokens and $15 per million output tokens , making it far more affordable than Claude 3.5 Opus at $15 and $75 respectively . These advancements in coding and logic systems help businesses achieve better automation outcomes, setting teams up for greater efficiency.
The integration of Claude 3.7 Sonnet with Latenode has had a noticeable impact on team performance and workflow efficiency. Here's how it stacks up:
| Metric | Claude 3.7 Sonnet | Claude 3.5 Opus |
|---|---|---|
| Code Accuracy (SWE-bench) | 62.3% | 49.0% |
| Task Completion Speed | Single pass for 45-min tasks | Multiple iterations required |
| Unnecessary Refusals | 45% reduction | Base reference |
| Cost per Million Tokens (Input) | $3.00 | $15.00 |
Teams using this setup report smoother automation workflows without needing deep coding expertise. For example, Canva's assessments revealed that Claude consistently generated production-ready code with better design quality and fewer errors .
With better accuracy, lower costs, and stronger reasoning abilities, Claude 3.7 Sonnet is the smarter choice for teams working on automation in Latenode. Its ability to handle both quick responses and detailed analysis, along with a 62.3% accuracy score in software engineering tasks , allows teams to build more reliable and efficient automated systems.
Building on the coding and reasoning capabilities discussed earlier, practical tests and case studies showcase how Claude 3.7 Sonnet performs in real-world scenarios.
Objective tests highlight the improved performance of Claude 3.7 Sonnet compared to its predecessor. Here's a breakdown of key improvements across different tasks:
| Industry Task | Claude 3.7 Sonnet | Claude 3.5 Opus |
|---|---|---|
| Retail Tool Usage | 81.2% | 71.5% |
| Airline Systems | 58.4% | 48.7% |
| Software Engineering | 62.3% | 49.0% |
| Code Problem Solving | 64.0% | 38.0% |
These results aren't just numbers - they translate into noticeable business benefits.
Case studies provide real-world examples of how Claude 3.7 Sonnet delivers results.
Teams using Claude 3.7 Sonnet have reported major operational gains, including:
These examples demonstrate how AI-driven solutions like Claude 3.7 Sonnet can streamline workflows, improve efficiency, and enhance low-code automation on platforms like Latenode.
The comparison reveals noticeable advancements in AI capabilities and business applications. Claude 3.7 Sonnet demonstrates improved performance across several benchmarks:
| Capability | Claude 3.7 Sonnet | Claude 3.5 Opus |
|---|---|---|
| SWE-bench | 62.3% | 49.0% |
| Retail Tool Usage | 81.2% | 71.5% |
| MATH Benchmark | 82.2% | 60.1% |
| MMMU Score | 71.8% | 59.4% |
On average, these metrics show a 14.4% performance boost. Its hybrid reasoning model, capable of both quick and detailed analysis, makes it stand out. It also reduces token costs while maintaining high-quality results.
These differences can guide your decision when choosing between the two models.
Here’s a quick guide to help you decide which model fits your needs. The choice largely depends on performance and cost considerations.
Claude 3.7 Sonnet is ideal if you need:
Claude 3.5 Opus is suitable for:
Choose based on your specific requirements and budget. For businesses focused on coding or automation workflows, Claude 3.7 Sonnet offers stronger performance and better value.
