.svg)
Comparisons
.jpg)
Radzivon Alkhovik
Low-code automation enthusiast
September 4, 2024
.png)
.svg){kind=icon}
.jpg)
Toggl Track and Clockify are two of the most popular time tracking tools on the market, both offering a range of features to help freelancers and teams accurately track time spent on projects. While Clockify may seem like an attractive option due to its lower pricing, Toggl Track emerges as the superior choice for most users thanks to its intuitive interface, advanced features, and focus on employee trust. In this article, we'll dive into a detailed comparison of Toggl Track and Clockify, examining their key differences in features, pricing, and overall user experience to help you determine which tool is the best fit for your needs.
Key Takeways: Toggl Track offers more flexibility with over 100 integrations, compared to Clockify's 80+. It better supports international teams with customizations for time zones and languages. While Clockify is more affordable, Toggl Track’s advanced features like detailed reports and billable rates provide greater long-term value. For remote teams, Toggl Track’s focus on privacy fosters trust, unlike Clockify’s surveillance features, which may lower employee engagement. Overall, Toggl Track is ideal for industries like IT and consulting, while Clockify suits smaller teams or freelancers with basic needs.
Since its creation in 2006, Toggl Track has evolved from a simple billing tool to a powerful, user-friendly time tracking app that promotes self-reflection and growth. The app's intuitive and engaging design, featuring a playful color scheme and straightforward layout, makes it easy for users to navigate and adopt, ensuring seamless integration into daily routines.
Toggl Track's standout features include automatic time tracking with the desktop app's Autotracker, which intelligently records time based on user activities and stores data locally for privacy and convenience. Users can also track time offline, with the app automatically syncing data once an internet connection is restored. Additionally, Toggl Track offers customization options, allowing users to create projects, tasks, set billable rates, and categorize time entries with tags, tailoring the experience to their needs.
By prioritizing user experience and offering powerful features, Toggl Track empowers employees to take control of their time management, fosters a culture of self-reflection and growth, and enables businesses to make data-driven decisions and optimize productivity. Toggl Track's commitment to user experience and productivity sets it apart from competitors like Clockify, making it the preferred choice for individuals and teams looking to streamline their workflows and boost performance.
Launched in 2017 by Nenad Milanovic and Lazar Vujanic, Clockify positions itself as a simple and affordable time tracking solution. The app offers a generous free plan that supports unlimited users and projects, making it an attractive option for teams on a tight budget. However, Clockify's user interface feels outdated and cluttered compared to Toggl Track's sleek and modern design, which may hinder user adoption and satisfaction.
One of the most controversial aspects of Clockify is its employee surveillance features, including GPS tracking and screenshot capture. While some managers may appreciate the increased level of oversight these features provide, they can foster distrust and negatively impact company culture. Employees may feel micromanaged and less motivated to perform their best work when they know their every move is being monitored.
In contrast, Toggl Track prioritizes employee privacy and trust, focusing on providing insights that help teams improve productivity and profitability without resorting to invasive surveillance tactics. By empowering employees to take ownership of their time management and productivity, Toggl Track promotes a healthier and more collaborative work environment.
While Clockify's affordability may be appealing to some businesses, its limitations in terms of user experience and employee trust may outweigh the potential cost savings in the long run. A time tracking tool that is difficult to use or causes employees to feel undervalued can ultimately lead to decreased productivity and higher turnover rates, offsetting any initial cost benefits.
When selecting a time-tracking tool, it's important to consider how well it fits into your existing processes and how smoothly it can be adopted by your team. Both Toggl Track and Clockify offer integration capabilities, but the ease of implementing these tools into established workflows can significantly impact overall efficiency and user adoption. Let’s take a closer look at how each platform handles integration and workflow compatibility.
For many businesses and freelancers, ease of integration into existing workflows is critical. Toggl Track excels here with over 100 integrations, including popular tools like Asana, Trello, and QuickBooks. This makes it easier to incorporate time tracking into a well-established process. While Clockify also offers integrations with 80+ apps, Toggl Track’s broader selection provides more flexibility and convenience.
For businesses with international teams, features like support for different time zones, multi-language options, and flexible scheduling are vital. Both tools offer support for teams working across various locations, but Toggl Track’s intuitive design and user-friendly customization make managing international projects smoother.
When considering which tool to choose, businesses need to think about return on investment (ROI). While Clockify’s lower price may seem more cost-effective at first glance, Toggl Track’s advanced features — such as detailed analytics, billable rates, and project templates — help teams increase productivity and profit, which can quickly offset the initial costs. Toggl Track provides robust reporting tools that allow businesses to make informed decisions, potentially leading to better overall project management and faster ROI.
It’s also worth noting how Toggl Track and Clockify stack up against other popular time tracking tools like Harvest or Hubstaff. Both Toggl Track and Clockify hold their own in terms of core time-tracking functionality, but Toggl Track stands out with its emphasis on design, employee trust, and ease of use. Clockify’s strength lies primarily in its affordability, making it a viable option for freelancers or smaller teams with simple time-tracking needs.
As remote and hybrid work environments become the norm, the ability to support these setups is crucial. Toggl Track’s focus on employee empowerment and privacy makes it particularly well-suited for remote teams. Its offline time-tracking capabilities and integration with collaborative tools make it easier for distributed teams to stay productive. Clockify, while functional, may feel more rigid in remote work settings due to its focus on surveillance features, which can negatively impact trust and employee morale.
Toggl Track and Clockify both offer broad functionality, but Toggl Track’s advanced analytics and customization features make it especially effective for industries that rely on detailed project management, such as IT, marketing, or consulting. Clockify, with its simpler interface, is better suited for smaller businesses or freelancers who need basic time tracking without advanced features.
One crucial difference between Toggl Track and Clockify is how they impact employee motivation and engagement. Toggl Track’s focus on employee privacy, trust, and self-management can create a more positive workplace culture, where employees feel empowered to manage their own time. Clockify’s emphasis on tracking and surveillance might lead to feelings of being micromanaged, which could lower engagement and productivity over time. In environments where trust and collaboration are key, Toggl Track’s approach fosters a healthier work dynamic.
Seamless integration between time-tracking tools and automation platforms can drastically improve productivity. Toggl Track stands out not only for its intuitive time-tracking features but also for its ability to integrate with various platforms, enabling users to automate workflows and streamline processes.
For example, Latenode, a low-code automation platform, can connect with Toggl Track to create powerful automation workflows.
Here's how such an integration can benefit users and boost productivity:
In a practical scenario, integrating Toggl Track with Latenode allows users to automate various tasks, such as updating project statuses or generating LinkedIn posts based on time entries. Here’s a step-by-step breakdown of how this integration could work:
Here is the result of the scenario:
By integrating Toggl Track with automation platforms like Latenode, businesses can reduce manual workload and maintain a smooth, automated workflow, ultimately improving efficiency across the board. Whether it's automating project updates, generating reports, or enhancing communication between platforms, these tools create a more streamlined and effective working environment.
Both Toggl Track and Clockify offer mobile applications to allow users to track time on the go. For professionals who frequently switch between desktop and mobile, the quality and functionality of these apps can be a deciding factor.
Toggl Track’s mobile app is known for its sleek, intuitive design, mirroring the simplicity of its desktop version. Users can easily start, pause, and stop timers, manage projects, and view time reports. The offline time-tracking feature is a major plus, allowing users to track time even without an internet connection, with data syncing as soon as connectivity is restored. The app supports both Android and iOS platforms, and the consistent user experience across devices ensures seamless transitions from mobile to desktop.
Clockify’s mobile app is functional but lacks the same level of polish as Toggl Track. Users can perform basic tasks like starting and stopping timers, viewing project details, and reviewing time logs. However, some users have noted that the app can feel a bit clunky compared to the desktop version, and certain advanced features (like generating detailed reports) are not as well-implemented on mobile. While Clockify also supports offline tracking, it may not sync as smoothly as Toggl Track once the connection is restored.
In summary:
When it comes to reporting and analytics, both Toggl Track and Clockify offer features to help teams track progress and measure productivity. However, Toggl Track’s advanced analytics give it a significant edge by providing deeper insights, making it the better option for teams that require robust data to drive decision-making.
Toggl Track also offers the ability to generate detailed reports based on individual or team performance, client projects, or overall company productivity. These reports can be exported in multiple formats (PDF, CSV, etc.) for further analysis or for sharing with stakeholders. Additionally, the scheduled reports feature enables managers to receive regular updates automatically, eliminating the need for manual report generation.
In contrast, Clockify’s reporting capabilities, while functional, are more basic. It offers standard metrics such as total hours worked or time spent on specific tasks, which may suffice for freelancers or smaller teams. However, it lacks the depth and customization options that growing businesses often require for more granular data to inform strategic decisions.
In summary:
Pricing is often a major consideration when choosing a time-tracking tool, and while Clockify initially appears more affordable, Toggl Track delivers better value when considering its features.
Clockify offers a free plan with basic time-tracking features for unlimited users, making it an attractive option for teams on a budget. Its paid plans start at $5.49 per user per month, which include features like enhanced reporting, project templates, and app integrations.
On the other hand, Toggl Track offers more comprehensive functionality in its Starter plan at $9 per user per month, which includes:
Toggl Track integrates with over 100 apps, including popular tools like Asana, Trello, and QuickBooks, which enhances productivity by syncing data across platforms. While Clockify also offers integrations, it supports fewer apps (around 80), limiting its flexibility for teams with specialized needs.
For businesses looking to maximize return on investment (ROI), Toggl Track’s advanced features and extensive integrations can lead to greater efficiency, billing accuracy, and better data insights, quickly offsetting the higher initial cost. For teams focused on scaling and optimizing processes, Toggl Track’s premium offering provides tangible improvements in productivity and profitability.
In the showdown between Toggl Track and Clockify, Toggl Track clearly emerges as the better choice for most users, particularly for teams looking for more than just basic time tracking. Its intuitive interface, advanced features, and focus on employee trust make it the ideal tool for teams that want to boost productivity while fostering a positive work environment.
Toggl Track excels with its robust reporting and analytics, offering users the ability to generate deep insights into how time is being spent across the organization. Its emphasis on customization allows businesses to tailor the tool to their specific needs, ensuring that they can track the metrics that matter most. Additionally, its advanced features, such as project templates, billable rates, and integrations, make it highly scalable and suitable for growing teams.
While Clockify may be a good fit for freelancers or smaller teams operating on tight budgets, its limitations in terms of reporting depth, integrations, and user experience make it less suitable for businesses looking to optimize efficiency and drive growth. Clockify’s focus on surveillance features, like GPS tracking and screenshot capture, may appeal to some managers but can negatively impact employee trust and motivation in the long term.
For businesses serious about growth, collaboration, and profitability, Toggl Track offers a better overall solution. Its combination of powerful features, a user-friendly interface, and a philosophy that emphasizes trust and productivity makes it the superior choice for teams aiming to streamline workflows and achieve sustainable success.
Clockify may be a better choice for freelancers or small teams operating on tight budgets, thanks to its free plan that supports unlimited users and projects. However, if advanced features like detailed reporting, project templates, and billable rates are needed, Toggl Track offers a richer feature set that can justify the higher price.
Yes, both platforms offer integrations with popular tools, but Toggl Track has the upper hand with over 100 integrations, including Asana, Trello, and QuickBooks. Clockify offers around 80 integrations, which is still substantial but may not be as versatile for more complex workflows.
Toggl Track prioritizes employee privacy and trust, offering tools to enhance productivity without invasive monitoring. Clockify, on the other hand, offers surveillance features like GPS tracking and screenshot capture, which may appeal to certain managers but can raise concerns about employee trust and engagement.
Yes, both Toggl Track and Clockify offer free plans. Clockify’s free plan is more generous, supporting unlimited users and projects, while Toggl Track’s free plan is better suited for individual users or very small teams with limited needs.
Toggl Track offers more advanced and customizable reporting options, including scheduled reports and detailed analytics, which make it easier to track performance over time. Clockify’s reporting is more basic, covering essential metrics like hours worked, but it lacks the depth and flexibility of Toggl Track’s reports.
Both Toggl Track and Clockify offer mobile apps for iOS and Android, but Toggl Track generally provides a more seamless transition between devices. Toggl Track’s app feels more like an extension of the desktop experience, while Clockify’s mobile app, though functional, may feel limited in comparison to its desktop version.
